Conservation frontiers: understanding the geographic expansion of conservation

被引:19
作者
Buchadas, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Siyu [1 ]
Meyfroidt, Patrick [3 ,4 ]
Kuemmerle, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Integrat Res Inst Transformat Human Environm Syst, Berlin, Germany
[3] UCLouvain, Earth & Life Inst, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[4] Fonds Rech Sci FNRS, Brussels, Belgium
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Agricultural expansion; land-use change; deforestation; area-based conservation; protected areas; lucc; PROTECTED AREAS; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY; DEFORESTATION; CHALLENGES; TERRITORIALITY; GOVERNANCE; INSIGHTS; POLITICS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/1747423X.2021.2018516
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Land-use frontiers, such as agriculture expanding into forests, remain a major driver of biodiversity loss, and often lead to conservation responses. To better understand the geographies of conservation, connecting conservation with tools used widely in Land System Science - particularly the frontier concept - allows assessing the patterns, actors, and drivers of conservation. We propose that land conservation can be analysed through three different perspectives. First, conservation can be framed as efforts to slow or stop other frontiers. Second, the expansion of conservation could itself be described as a frontier process, similarly leading to institutional and cultural reorganization, and sometimes conflicts (e.g. green grabbing). Third, frontiers can be seen as spaces where multiple land uses, including conservation, interact. Analysing conservation through these perspectives could be particularly powerful to thoroughly consider the social-ecological contexts in which conservation happens, and thus to bridge the disciplines of Land System Science and Conservation Science.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 25
页数:14
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Abeygunawardane D., 2020, RESOURCE FRONTIERS A, DOI [10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00024, DOI 10.31220/AGRIRXIV.2020.00024]
[2]   Geographies of conservation III: Nature's spaces [J].
Adams, William M. .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 44 (04) :789-801
[3]   Extractive Reserves in the Brazilian Amazon thirty years after Chico Mendes: social movement achievements, territorial expansion and continuing struggles [J].
Aguiar Gomes, Carlos Valerio ;
Alencar, Ane ;
Vadjunec, Jacqueline Michelle ;
Pacheco, Leonardo Marques .
DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2018, 48 :74-98
[4]   Institutional Change on a Conservationist Frontier: Local Responses to a Grabbing Process in the Name of Environmental Protection [J].
Alvarado, Lisa .
LAND, 2019, 8 (12)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BUSINESS NATURE
[6]   Neoliberal Capitalism and Conservation in the Post-crisis Era: The Dialectics of "Green" and "Un-green" Grabbing in Greece and the UK [J].
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia ;
Adams, William M. .
ANTIPODE, 2015, 47 (01) :15-35
[7]  
Barbier E.B., 2010, SCARCITY FRONTIERS E, DOI [10.1017/CBO97805117.81131, DOI 10.1017/CBO97805117.81131]
[8]   The global tree restoration potential [J].
Bastin, Jean-Francois ;
Finegold, Yelena ;
Garcia, Claude ;
Mollicone, Danilo ;
Rezende, Marcelo ;
Routh, Devin ;
Zohner, Constantin M. ;
Crowther, Thomas W. .
SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6448) :76-+
[9]   Territoriality by Conservation in the Selous-Niassa Corridor in Tanzania [J].
Bluwstein, Jevgeniy ;
Lund, Jens Friis .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 101 :453-465
[10]   An experimental test of community-based strategies for mitigating human-wildlife conflict around protected areas [J].
Branco, Paola S. ;
Merkle, Jerod A. ;
Pringle, Robert M. ;
King, Lucy ;
Tindall, Tosca ;
Stalmans, Marc ;
Long, Ryan A. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2020, 13 (01)