Characterization of the effect of a new commercial transmission detector on radiation therapy beams

被引:6
作者
Cheung, Joey P. [1 ]
Perez-Andujar, Angelica [1 ]
Morin, Olivier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, 505 Parnassus Ave,L08D, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
QUALITY-ASSURANCE; PROSTATE-CANCER; IMRT; VERIFICATION; SYSTEM; DEVICE; ARRAY; SKIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2017.04.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a new commercial transmission detector on radiation therapy beams. Methods and materials: A transmission detector designed for online treatment monitoring was characterized on a TrueBeam STx linear accelerator with 6-MV, 6-flattening filter free, 10-MV, and 10-flattening filter free beams. Measurements of percentage depth doses, in-plane and cross-plane off-axis profiles at different depths, transmission factors, and skin dose were acquired with 3 x 3, 5 x 5, 10 x 10, 20 x 20, and 40 x 40 cm(2) field sizes at 100 cm and 80 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). A CC04 chamber was used for all profile and transmission factor measurements. Skin dose was assessed at 100, 90, and 80 cm SSD using a variety of detectors (Roos and Markus parallel-plate chambers and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters [OSLDs]). Skin dose was also assessed for various patient sample plans with OSLDs. Results: The percentage depth doses showed small differences between the unperturbed and perturbed beams for 100 cm SSD (<= 4 mm depth of maximum dose difference, <1.2% average profile difference) for all field sizes. At 80 cm SSD, the differences were larger (<= 8 mm depth of maximum dose difference, <3% average profile difference). The differences were larger for the flattened beams and larger field sizes. The off-axis profiles showed similar trends. Field penumbras looked similar with and without the transmission detector. Comparisons in the profile central 80% showed a maximum average (maximum) profile difference between all field sizes of 1.0% (2.6%) and 1.4% (6.3%) for 100 and 80 cm SSD, respectively. The average measured skin dose increase at 100 cm (80 cm) SSD for a 10 x 10 cm2 field size was <4% (<35%) for all energies. For a 40 x 40 cm(2) field size, this increased to <31%(<= 63%). For the sample patient plans, the average skin dose difference was 0.53% (range, -6.6% to 10.4%). Conclusions: The transmission detector has minimal effect on clinically relevant radiation therapy beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric arc therapy (field sizes 10 x 10 cm(2) and less). For larger field sizes, some perturbations are observable that would need to be assessed for clinical impact. (C) 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E559 / E567
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Alrowaili ZA, 2015, J INSTRUM, V10, DOI [10.1088/1748-0221/2015/9/P09019, 10.1088/1748-0221/10/09/P09019]
[2]   PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF IRRADIATED SKIN AND BREAST [J].
ARCHAMBEAU, JO ;
PEZNER, R ;
WASSERMAN, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1171-1185
[3]   Investigation of the spatial resolution of an online dose verification device [J].
Asuni, G. ;
Rickey, D. W. ;
McCurdy, B. M. C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) :697-705
[4]   PATIENT-SPECIFIC 3D PRETREATMENT AND POTENTIAL 3D ONLINE DOSE VERIFICATION OF MONTE CARLO-CALCULATED IMRT PROSTATE TREATMENT PLANS [J].
Boggula, Ramesh ;
Jahnke, Lennart ;
Wertz, Hansjoerg ;
Lohr, Frank ;
Wenz, Frederik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04) :1168-1175
[5]   Patient specific IMRT quality assurance with film, ionization chamber and detector arrays: Our institutional experience [J].
Cruz, Wilbert ;
Narayanasamy, Ganesh ;
Regan, Morgan ;
Mavroidis, Panayiotis ;
Papanikolaou, Niko ;
Ha, Chul S. ;
Stathakis, Sotirios .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2015, 115 :12-16
[6]   Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM [J].
Das, Indra J. ;
Cheng, Chee-Wai ;
Watts, Ronald J. ;
Ahnesjo, Anders ;
Gibbons, John ;
Li, X. Allen ;
Lowenstein, Jessica ;
Mitra, Raj K. ;
Simon, William E. ;
Zhu, Timothy C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) :4186-4215
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF DOSE IN THE BUILDUP REGION USING FIXED-SEPARATION PLANE-PARALLEL IONIZATION CHAMBERS [J].
GERBI, BJ ;
KHAN, FM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (01) :17-26
[8]   An integral quality monitoring system for real-time verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy [J].
Islam, Mohammad K. ;
Norrlinger, Bernhard D. ;
Smale, Jason R. ;
Heaton, Robert K. ;
Galbraith, Duncan ;
Fan, Cary ;
Jaffray, David A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (12) :5420-5428
[9]   Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements [J].
Jursinic, Paul A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) :4594-4604
[10]   Clinical introduction of a linac head-mounted 2D detector array based quality assurance system in head and neck IMRT [J].
Korevaar, Erik W. ;
Wauben, David J. L. ;
van der Hulst, Peter C. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. ;
Van't Veld, Aart A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 100 (03) :446-452