Real-Life Efficacy, Safety, and Use of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Posterior Segment Inflammation Due to Non-infectious Uveitis (LOUVRE 2 Study)

被引:9
作者
Bodaghi, Bahram [1 ]
Brezin, Antoine P. [2 ]
Weber, Michel [3 ]
Delcourt, Cecile [4 ]
Kodjikian, Laurent [5 ,6 ]
Provost, Alexandra [7 ]
Velard, Marie-Eve [7 ]
Barnier-Ripet, Doris [8 ]
Pinchinat, Sybil [8 ]
Dupont-Benjamin, Laure [7 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Pitie Salpetriere Hosp, AP HP, IHU FOReSIGHT,Dept Ophthalmol, 47-83 Boul Hop, F-75013 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Hop Cochin, AP HP, Ctr Ophtalmol, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Nantes, Nantes, France
[4] Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux Populat Hlth Res Ctr, INSERM, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
[5] Univ Hosp Lyon, La Croix Rousse Hosp, Lyon, France
[6] Univ Lyon Claude Bernard, UMR CNRS MATEIS INSA Lyon 5510, Lyon, France
[7] Allergan, Courbevoie, France
[8] Axonal Biostatem, Castries, France
关键词
Dexamethasone; France; Intravitreal; Real-world evidence; Uveitis; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; INTERMEDIATE; OZURDEX; CORTICOSTEROIDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40123-022-00525-8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction To evaluate real-life efficacy, safety, and treatment patterns with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis (treatment-naive or not) in French clinics. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, observational, non-comparative, post-reimbursement study, consecutive patients with posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis were enrolled and evaluated at baseline (day 0). Those who received DEX on day 0 were re-evaluated at months 2, 6, and 18. Retreatment with DEX and/or alternative therapies was allowed during follow-up. Primary outcome: patients (%) with at least a 15-letter gain in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 2 months. Secondary outcomes included patients (%) with at least 15-letter BCVA gains at 6 and 18 months; mean BCVA change from baseline at 2, 6, and 18 months; and patients (%) retreated, mean central retinal thickness (CRT), and adverse events (AEs) at all post-baseline visits. Results Ninety-seven of 245 enrolled patients with posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis (80% previously treated) and disease duration of 5 years (average) received DEX on day 0 and were included in efficacy analyses. At month 2 (n = 91), 20.5% of patients (95% CI 12.0-28.9) gained at least 15 letters from a baseline mean of 60.9 letters; the mean gain was 6.2 letters (95% CI 3.5-8.9). At month 6, 50.0% (n = 38/76) of patients did not receive alternative treatment or DEX retreatment, mostly because inflammation had sufficiently subsided (n = 27/38, 71.1%). Although early study termination prevented efficacy analysis at 18 months (n = 12), CRT reductions persisted throughout follow-up. From baseline to month 18, 21/245 (8.6%) patients had DEX-related AEs; 17/245 (6.9%) had ocular hypertension (most common AE). Conclusion LOUVRE 2 confirms DEX efficacy on visual acuity and CRT in predominantly DEX-pretreated patients with relatively old/stabilized uveitis. DEX tolerability was consistent with known/published data, confirming treatment benefits in posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02951975.
引用
收藏
页码:1775 / 1792
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Agence nationale de securite du medicament et des produits de sante, OZ 700 MICR IMPL INT
  • [2] Allergan (an AbbVie company), HIGHL PRESCR INF OZU
  • [3] A review of therapies for diabetic macular oedema and rationale for combination therapy
    Amoaku, W. M. K.
    Saker, S.
    Stewart, E. A.
    [J]. EYE, 2015, 29 (09) : 1115 - 1130
  • [4] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20): : 2191 - 2194
  • [5] [Anonymous], Summary of product characteristics - Eflexor
  • [6] Association des Epidemiologistes de Langue Francaise (ADELF), REC PROF STAND GOOD
  • [7] Efficacy of Ozurdex implant in recalcitrant diabetic macular edema-a single-center experience
    Bansal, Pooja
    Gupta, Vishali
    Gupta, Amod
    Dogra, Mangat Ram
    Ram, Jagat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 36 (02) : 207 - 216
  • [8] A multicenter, 12-month randomized study comparing dexamethasone intravitreal implant with ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema
    Callanan, David G.
    Loewenstein, Anat
    Patel, Sunil S.
    Massin, Pascale
    Corcostegui, Borja
    Li, Xiao-Yan
    Jiao, Jenny
    Hashad, Yehia
    Whitcup, Scott M.
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 255 (03) : 463 - 473
  • [9] Corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema
    Chawan-Saad, Jorge
    Wu, Max
    Wu, Andres
    Wu, Lihteh
    [J]. TAIWAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 9 (04) : 233 - 242
  • [10] Oral corticosteroid exposure and increased risk of related complications in patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis: Real-world data analysis
    Chirikov, Viktor V.
    Shah, Ruchit
    Kwon, Youngmin
    Patel, Dipen
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) : 27 - 46