The misleading effect of energy efficiency information on perceived energy friendliness of electric goods

被引:52
作者
Waechter, Signe [1 ]
Suetterlin, Bernadette [1 ]
Siegrist, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, IED, Consumer Behav, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Energy label; Energy consumption; Energy efficiency; Decision making; Decision heuristic; Rebound effect; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; DECISION-MAKING; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; LESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union energy label informs consumers at the point of sale about the energy efficiency and electricity consumption of various electric goods. The label should enable consumers to purchase energy-friendly products (i.e., products with low energy consumption), thereby making a significant contribution to the reduction of overall energy consumption. This paper offers a systematic analysis of consumers' interpretation of the energy label. The results of a set of experimental studies revealed that consumers tend to base their estimates of a product's energy consumption mainly on the energy efficiency class (e.g., A) communicated on the energy label and largely ignore information about annual electricity consumption (e.g., 120 kWh/year). Thereby, consumers potentially overestimate the energy friendliness of a product assigned a high energy efficiency rating. This also holds true when consumers directly compare two products in terms of energy friendliness. Thus, participants chose a higher-consuming product because it had a high energy efficiency rating. High energy efficiency ratings (e.g., A(+++)) can distort consumers' perceptions of product categories that consume excessively (e.g., freezers). Participants were seduced into thinking that a high energy efficiency rating (e.g., A(++)) means the energy consumption of energy hogs is no longer problematic. This paper provides evidence that the energy label could have a contrary effect than the one intended due to people's susceptibility to an energy efficiency fallacy. This misinterpretation of the energy label could further explain why overall energy demand is increasing despite enhanced energy efficiency. Finally, implications for policy makers and further research for enhancement of the energy label are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 202
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
EnergieSchweiz, 2013, EN LAB COOL FREEZ AP
[12]  
European Council, 2012, OFF J EUR UNION ONLI
[13]  
Eurostat, 2012, EN TRANSP ENV IND PU
[14]   Heuristic Decision Making [J].
Gigerenzer, Gerd ;
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 62, 2011, 62 :451-482
[15]  
Gossling S, 2014, J CLEAN PROD
[16]  
Greening LA, 2000, ENERG POLICY, V28, P389, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5
[17]  
Hsee CK, 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V11, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<107::AID-BDM292>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-Y
[19]   The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (03) :247-257
[20]   THE ENERGY-EFFICIENCY GAP - WHAT DOES IT MEAN [J].
JAFFE, AB ;
STAVINS, RN .
ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (10) :804-810