Techno-economic assessment of carbonate melt flue gas desulfurization process

被引:13
作者
Lee, Juwon [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Hyungtae [1 ]
Moon, Il [2 ]
Lubomirsky, Igor [3 ]
Kaplan, Valery [3 ]
Kim, Junghwan [1 ]
Ahn, Yuchan [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Ind Technol, Green Mat & Proc R&D Grp, Ulsan 44413, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Chem & Biomol Engn, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[3] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Mat & Interfaces, 234 Herzl St, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
关键词
Carbonate melt; Sulfur dioxide; Regeneration; Heat integration; Techno-economic assessment; Pollution abatement; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; SO2; EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE; COAL; REGENERATION; TECHNOLOGIES; REDUCTION; CAPTURE; NETWORK; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107227
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a pollutant that is mainly emitted in thermal coal-fired power plants, and it causes air pollution, which is required to be removed since it adversely affects the atmosphere environment. This study presents a novel approach to remove SO2 using carbonate melt by designing a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process that uses a carbonate melt desulfurization (CMD) subsystem to remove > 99.9 wt% of SO2 and a carbonate melt regeneration (CMR) subsystem that recovers similar to 99 wt% of the melt. To reduce the operating costs of the proposed process, a heat-exchanger network was developed to use the waste heat that existed in the process. The levelized cost of the proposed FGD process using carbonate melt was determined as US$ 761/ton SO2 removed and is therefore cost-competitive with other SO2 removal technologies. Sensitivity analysis indicates that coal price is the main driver of levelized cost. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Techno-economic performance of enhanced sodium carbonate-based CO2 capture process [J].
Melin, Kristian ;
Hurskainen, Markus ;
Nevander, Miia ;
Kajolinna, Tuula .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2025, 141
[22]   Techno-economic assessment of decarbonization pathways for a gas to liquid facility: A review [J].
Awani, Kelvin ;
Hanak, Dawid ;
Kumar, Vinod ;
Nabavi, Seyed Ali .
JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2024, 90
[23]   Techno-Economic Assessment and Environmental Impact of Shale Gas Alternatives to Methanol [J].
Julian-Duran, Laura M. ;
Ortiz-Espinoza, Andrea P. ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. ;
Jimenez-Gutierrez, Arturo .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2014, 2 (10) :2338-2344
[24]   Techno-Economic Assessment of a Microalgae Biorefinery [J].
Guo, Bingfeng ;
Hornung, Ursel ;
Zhang, Shicheng ;
Dahmen, Nicolaus .
CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2023, 95 (06) :950-954
[25]   Entomoculture: A Preliminary Techno-Economic Assessment [J].
Ashizawa, Reina ;
Rubio, Natalie ;
Letcher, Sophia ;
Parkinson, Avery ;
Dmitruczyk, Victoria ;
Kaplan, David L. .
FOODS, 2022, 11 (19)
[26]   Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Utilisation Potential in Europe [J].
Perez-Fortes, Mar ;
Bocin-Dumitriu, Andrei ;
Tzimas, Evangelos .
PRES 2014, 17TH CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, PTS 1-3, 2014, 39 :1453-1458
[27]   Techno-economic assessment of a membrane-based wastewater reclamation process [J].
Perez, Gema ;
Gomez, Pedro ;
Ortiz, Inmaculada ;
Urtiaga, Ane .
DESALINATION, 2022, 522
[28]   Process Synthesis, Design and Techno-Economic Assessment of Malonic Acid Production [J].
Ioannidou, Virginia ;
Misailidis, Nikiforos ;
Petrides, Demetri ;
Georgiadis, Michael C. .
PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (11)
[29]   Carbonate melt-based flue gas desulphurisation: material balance and economic advantage [J].
Kaplan, Valery ;
Wachtel, Ellen ;
Dosmukhamedov, Nurlan ;
Lubomirsky, Igor .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OIL GAS AND COAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 18 (1-2) :25-38
[30]   Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analyses of a Coke Oven Gas Reuse Process for Methanol Production [J].
Portha, Jean-Francois ;
Uribe-Soto, Wilmar ;
Commenge, Jean-Marc ;
Valentin, Solene ;
Falk, Laurent .
PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (06)