The performance of US equity mutual funds

被引:15
作者
Babalos, Vassilios [1 ]
Mamatzakis, Emmanuel C. [2 ]
Matousek, Roman [3 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Peloponnese, Sch Management & Econ, Dept Accounting & Finance, Peloponnese, Greece
[2] Univ Sussex, Business Management & Econ Sch, Falmer BN1 9RF, E Sussex, England
[3] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT2 7PE, Kent, England
关键词
US fund performance; Stochastic frontier analysis; Panel VAR; Risk; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MORNINGSTAR RATINGS; EFFICIENCY; DECOMPOSITION; TOURNAMENTS; PERSISTENCE; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The paper examines the performance of US no-load equity mutual funds. Fund performance is derived using stochastic frontier analysis for a flexible functional form. This analysis allows us to derive parametric estimates of efficiency scores for each fund in our sample for the first time in the literature. Our results indicate that US no-load equity funds display varying levels of efficiency over time but also depending on size and on investment style. Robustness analysis reaffirm the efficiency scores remain consistent across different selections of inputs and outputs as well as the underlying distribution of the return. Having estimated each fund's efficiency in the sample we unveil their underlying dynamics, also with respect to risk and operational characteristics such as flows, assets, and Morningstar star ratings. Panel-VAR estimations reveal that the response of funds' efficiency to a shock in risk is positive and substantial. Some evidence of reverse causality is also observed. Finally, we extend our analysis to investigate the relationship between funds performance and key covariates across subgroups defined by size. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 229
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[21]   Asset sales in the mutual fund industry: Who gains? [J].
Chen, Fan ;
Sanger, Gary C. ;
Slovin, Myron B. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (12) :4834-4849
[22]   Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization [J].
Chen, J ;
Hong, H ;
Huang, M ;
Kubik, JD .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (05) :1276-1302
[23]   Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives [J].
Chevalier, J ;
Ellison, G .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (06) :1167-1200
[24]  
Choi Y.K., 2001, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V28, P853
[25]   Changes to mutual fund risk: Intentional or mean reverting? [J].
Cullen, Grant ;
Gasbarro, Dominic ;
Monroe, Gary S. ;
Zumwalt, J. Kenton .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (01) :112-120
[26]   A robust nonparametric approach to evaluate and explain the performance of mutual funds [J].
Daraio, Cinzia ;
Simar, Leopold .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 175 (01) :516-542
[27]   Star Power: The Effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow [J].
Del Guercio, Diane ;
Tkac, Paula A. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2008, 43 (04) :907-936
[28]  
DeYoung R., 1997, J FINANCIAL SERVICES, V15
[29]   EFFICIENCY WITH COSTLY INFORMATION - A REINTERPRETATION OF EVIDENCE FROM MANAGED PORTFOLIOS [J].
ELTON, EJ ;
GRUBER, MJ ;
DAS, S ;
HLAVKA, M .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1993, 6 (01) :1-22
[30]   THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY [J].
FARRELL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1957, 120 (03) :253-290