Estimating the economic benefits of a wetland restoration programme in New Zealand: A contingent valuation approach

被引:32
作者
Ndebele, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Forgie, Vicky [3 ]
机构
[1] Clark Univ, George Perkins Marsh Inst, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[2] Univ Waikato, Dept Econ, Hamilton Campus Gate 1,Knighton Rd, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[3] Massey Univ, Ecol Econ Res New Zealand, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
关键词
Contingent valuation method; Wetland; Dichotomous choice; Willingness to pay; Total economic value; New Zealand; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; WELFARE EVALUATIONS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CHOICE; DISTANCE; VALUES; WILDERNESS; PREFERENCE; EXISTENCE; WTP;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2017.05.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Decades of failure to evaluate the ecosystem services provided by the Pekapeka Swamp located in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand, led to decisions that allowed prolonged degradation of the wetland. In 1998 a long-term management plan was adopted to restore and preserve the swamp without evaluating the potential welfare benefits of the plan. This paper employs the contingent valuation method to estimate the total economic value of the restoration and preservation of Pekapeka Swamp. Data required for the analysis was generated using a survey questionnaire administered by mail to 958 households in the Hawke's Bay region in 2008. An effective response rate of 42% was achieved after a second reminder. Using a dichotomous choice format with a follow-up open-ended valuation question, this study shows that, based on the population of the Hawke's Bay region, the estimated total economic value ranges from NZ$1.64 million to NZ$3.78 million per year and the net present value ranges between NZ$5.05 million and NZ$16.39 million. These results imply that the restoration and preservation of Pekapeka Swamp is an important investment which the authorities should continue to support. These estimates may be used to justify future increases in the level of expenditure on the project. (C) 2017 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 89
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Georgiou, Stavros ;
Lake, Iain .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) :450-460
[12]   Non-users' willingness to pay for a National Park: An application and critique of the contingent valuation method [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Langford, IH .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1997, 31 (06) :571-582
[13]   USE OF DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE NONMARKET METHODS TO VALUE THE WHOOPING CRANE RESOURCE [J].
BOWKER, JM ;
STOLL, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 70 (02) :372-381
[14]   WELFARE MEASUREMENTS USING CONTINGENT VALUATION - A COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
BISHOP, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 70 (01) :20-28
[15]   Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects [J].
Brouwer, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (01) :137-152
[17]   Incentive and informational properties of preference questions [J].
Carson, Richard T. ;
Groves, Theodore .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (01) :181-210
[18]   Contingent valuation: A user's guide [J].
Carson, RT .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1413-1418
[19]   Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill [J].
Carson, RT ;
Mitchell, RC ;
Hanemann, M ;
Kopp, RJ ;
Presser, S ;
Ruud, PA .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (03) :257-286
[20]   Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J].
Carson, RT ;
Flores, NE ;
Meade, NF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :173-210