Understanding nursing students' perspectives on the grading of group work assessments

被引:16
作者
Smith, Morgan [1 ]
Rogers, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
Education; Nursing; Assessment; Group work; NURSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.012
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Grading group work assessments so that students perceive the grade to be fair to all group members is sometimes challenging. This is particularly important in a higher education environment that is increasingly concerned with student perceptions of teaching quality and satisfaction. This article reports on research that compared undergraduate nursing students perceptions of two different approaches to the grading of group work assessment. A survey design was used to identify students' perspectives and preferences for different group work assessment methods. Participants were undergraduate bachelor of nursing students from a large, metropolitan university in Australia. Data analysis indicated that the perceptions of students around group work assessments changed little as they progressed across the program, although students who had experienced the calculation of individual grades for a group assessment preferred this approach. Many believed the grading of group assessments penalised good students and were less reliable than individual assessments. Students maintained the belief that teamwork skills were essential for the registered nurse role. In conclusion group work assessment should only be used when it is the best assessment method to demonstrate student learning of specific objectives. The weighted mark approach is the group work assessment grading approach of choice. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 116
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NEW DIRECTIONS TEACH, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.65
[2]   The effectiveness of high fidelity simulation on medical-surgical registered nurses' ability to recognise and respond to clinical emergencies [J].
Buckley, Thomas ;
Gordon, Christopher .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (07) :716-721
[3]   Making group assessment transparent: what wikis can contribute to collaborative projects [J].
Caple, Helen ;
Bogle, Mike .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (02) :198-210
[4]  
Elliott Naomi, 2005, Nurse Educ Pract, V5, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2004.03.004
[5]   SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects [J].
Freeman, M ;
McKenzie, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 33 (05) :551-569
[6]  
Freshwater D., 2002, THERAPEUTIC NURSING
[7]  
Goldfinch J., 1994, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V19, P29, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260293940190103
[8]   Student Experience of Group Work and Group Assessment in Higher Education [J].
Hassanien, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN TRAVEL & TOURISM, 2006, 6 (01) :17-39
[9]   Factors affecting assertiveness among student nurses [J].
Ibrahim, Sanaa Abd El Azim .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (04) :356-360
[10]  
Lejk M., 1999, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V24, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260293990240101