共 30 条
Exercise prescription dose for castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients: a phase I prescription dose escalation trial
被引:2
作者:
Bultijnck, Renee
[1
,2
]
Deforche, Benedicte
[3
,4
]
Borrey, Noemi
[5
]
Van Bauwel, Joergen
[5
]
Lievens, Maarten
[5
]
Rammant, Elke
[1
]
Fonteyne, Valerie
[1
]
Decaestecker, Karel
[1
]
Steyaert, Adelheid
[5
]
Lumen, Nicolaas
[1
]
Ost, Piet
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Human Struct & Repair, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Flanders FWO, Res Fdn, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Phys Act Nutr & Hlth, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Ghent, Belgium
关键词:
Castration-resistant prostate cancer;
Exercise;
Physical activity;
Phase;
1;
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY;
GUIDELINES;
MEN;
DISEASE;
SAFETY;
D O I:
10.1007/s00345-020-03098-y
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Purpose To determine the start exercise prescription dose in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving second-line hormone treatment and recommended phase II exercise prescription. Methods Patients were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation phase I trial of aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises to evaluate dose-limiting tolerance and safety. Tolerance was defined as Borg score <= 16 and safety (pain) as a visual analogue scale score (VAS) <= 3 and CTCAE grade < 2. Dose level 1 (escalation start dose) was set at 15 min. Aerobic training (50-80% HRmax warm-up and cooling-down; and 65-80% HRmax. core), 1 set with 8-10 repetitions (reps.) resistance training (50-60% 1-RM, 8 exercises), and 1 set (30s) with 2 reps flexibility training (5 exercises). The prescription dose escalation was designed in four levels (from dose -1 to 3), with a dose escalation in volume and intensity of the exercises. Results Nine patients were included in two dosing cohorts and were under active treatment (n = 4 abiraterone acetate and n = 5 enzalutamide). Dose limiting safety concerns were observed in 2 out of 3 patients in dose level 2 and 1 patient out of 6 in dose level 1 due to VAS > 3 during resistance training and/or flexibility training. No tolerance issues were observed in the two dosing cohorts. The optimal start exercise prescription dose was set at dose level 1 due to safety issues at dose level 2. Conclusion Our findings suggest that exercise is perceived tolerable in mCRPC patients receiving second-line hormone therapy. Caution is indicated on safety during performance of the exercises.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 364
页数:8
相关论文