Live Image Processing Does Not Increase Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Comparison Between FICE and Conventional Imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5)

被引:80
作者
Aminalai, Alireza
Roesch, Thomas [1 ]
Aschenbeck, Jens
Mayr, Michael
Drossel, Rolf
Schroeder, Andreas
Scheel, Matthias
Treytnar, Doris
Gauger, Ulrich [2 ]
Stange, Gabriela [2 ]
Simon, Frank [2 ]
Adler, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Charite Med Univ Hosp, Cent Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Dept Gastroenterol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
HIGH-DEFINITION; STANDARD COLONOSCOPY; POLYP DETECTION; WHITE-LIGHT; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CHROMOSCOPY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2010.273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy (FICE) is a post-processing imaging technique for increasing contrast of mucosa and mucosal lesions that might lead to improvement in colonic adenoma detection during colonoscopy. Previous studies on similar contrast-enhancing techniques as well as on dye staining have yielded variable and conflicting results. This large randomized trial was undertaken to determine whether FICE technology enhances adenoma detection rate (ADR). METHODS: In a prospective study performed in a multicenter private practice and hospital setting, involving 8 examiners with substantial lifetime experience (>10,000 colonoscopies each), 1,318 patients (men 46.7%, women 53.3%; mean age 59.05 years) were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with either FICE or white light imaging on instrument withdrawal. Of the colonoscopies, 68% were screening and 32% were diagnostic examinations. The primary outcome measure was the ADR (i.e., number of adenomas/total number of patients). RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of general ADR (0.28 in both groups), the total number of adenomas (184 vs. 183), or detection of subgroups of adenomas. The rate of identification of hyperplastic polyps was also the same in both groups (127 vs. 121; P=0.67). The results were the same for both the screening and the diagnostic colonoscopy subgroups. Withdrawal time was the same in both groups (8.4 vs. 8.3 min, P=0.55). CONCLUSIONS: This large randomized trial could not show any objective advantage of the FICE technique over conventional high-resolution endoscopy in terms of improved ADR.
引用
收藏
页码:2383 / 2388
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection:: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?
    Adler, A.
    Pohl, H.
    Papanikolaou, I. S.
    Abou-Rebyeh, H.
    Schachschal, G.
    Veltzke-Schlieker, W.
    Khalifa, A. C.
    Setka, E.
    Koch, M.
    Wiedenmann, B.
    Roesch, T.
    [J]. GUT, 2008, 57 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [2] ADLER A, USE NEW TECHNO UNPUB
  • [3] Narrow-Band Versus White-Light High Definition Television Endoscopic Imaging for Screening Colonoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Adler, Andreas
    Aschenbeck, Jens
    Yenerim, Timur
    Mayr, Michael
    Aminalai, Alireza
    Drossel, Rolf
    Schroeder, Andreas
    Scheel, Matthias
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Roesch, Thomas
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (02) : 410 - 416
  • [4] Bianchi FK, 2008, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V67, pAB305
  • [5] Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?
    Bretagne, J. -F.
    Ponchon, T.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (06) : 523 - 528
  • [6] Does the use of high definition white light Colonoscopy leads to higher adenoma detection rates compared to standard definition white light colonoscopy. An effectiveness study in 1225 patients
    Buchner, Anna M.
    Ghabril, Marwan S.
    Gross, Seth a.
    Cleveland, Patrick W.
    Gill, Kanwar R.
    Schore, Anthony
    Picco, Michael F.
    Loeb, David S.
    Cangemi, John R.
    Raimondo, Massimo
    Wolfsen, Herbert C.
    Woodward, Timothy a.
    Devault, Kenneth R.
    Wallance, Michael B.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB130 - AB130
  • [7] CHA JM, 2009, DIG DIS SCI 1016
  • [8] A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Chang, Chi-Yang
    Chen, Chien-Chuan
    Lee, Yi-Chia
    Wu, Ming-Shiang
    Lin, Jaw-Town
    Shun, Chia-Tung
    Wang, Hsiu-Po
    [J]. GUT, 2007, 56 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [9] 170° wide-angle colonoscope:: Effect on efficiency and miss rates
    Deenadayalu, VP
    Chadalawada, V
    Rex, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (11) : 2138 - 2142
  • [10] A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique
    East, J. E.
    Stavrindis, M.
    Thomas-Gibson, S.
    Guenther, T.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    Saunders, B. P.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 28 (06) : 768 - 776