Reducing the Pain of Nasogastric Tube Intubation with Nebulized and Atomized Lidocaine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:27
作者
Kuo, Ya-Wen [2 ,3 ]
Yen, Miaofen [1 ,2 ]
Fetzer, Susan [4 ]
Lee, Jiann-Der [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Nursing, Coll Med, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Allied Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[3] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Nursing, Changhua, Taiwan
[4] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Nursing, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurol, Puzih City, Taiwan
关键词
Nasogastric intubation; nebulized lidocaine; atomized lidocaine; meta-analysis; DOUBLE-BLIND; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; INSERTION; DISCOMFORT; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.025
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Nasogastric tube (NGT) intubations occur frequently in clinical practice and can be a painful procedure for patients. A systematic review of current knowledge concerning the use of nebulized lidocaine to reduce the pain of NOT insertion was conducted in. order to develop evidence-based guidelines. In addition, a meta-analysis of appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The databases included PubMed (1996-2009), ProQuest (1982-2009), CINAHL (1982-2009), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2009), and reference lists of articles. Experts in this field also were contacted. Two investigators selected the research based on inclusion criteria and reviewed each study's quality according to the Jadad scale. Five RCTs with 212 subjects were identified. A total of 113 (58%) subjects were women. The mean age of treatment and control groups was 59.6 and 55 years, respectively. The countries of studies were the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and Thailand. In the treatment groups, the use of lidocaine concentration was 4% and 10%. The pooled effect size was 0.423 (95% confidence interval: 0.204-0.880; Z = -2.301; P = 0.021), indicating that the use of nebulized lidocaine before NGT insertion can decrease pain by 57.7%. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the dosage, concentration., or delivery method. Further research is needed to articulate a comprehensive clinical guideline. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;40:613-620. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Does Nebulized Lidocaine Reduce the Pain and Distress of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Young Children? A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [J].
Babl, Franz E. ;
Goldfinch, Christopher ;
Mandrawa, Christine ;
Crellin, Dianne ;
O'Sullivan, Ronan ;
Donath, Susan .
PEDIATRICS, 2009, 123 (06) :1548-1555
[2]  
Best Carolyn, 2007, Nurs Stand, V21, P39
[3]  
Borenstein M., 2013, BIOSTAT
[4]   Nebulized lidocaine decreases the discomfort of nasogastric tube insertion: A randomized, double-blind trial [J].
Cullen, L ;
Taylor, D ;
Taylor, S ;
Chu, K .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 44 (02) :131-137
[5]  
Ducharme James, 2003, J Emerg Nurs, V29, P427, DOI 10.1016/S0099-1767(03)00295-2
[6]   Intrapleural placement of a nasogastric tube: An unusual complication of nasotracheal intubation [J].
Fisman, DN ;
Ward, ME .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (12) :1252-1256
[7]   Nasogastric tubes: Hard to swallow [J].
Gallagher, EJ .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 44 (02) :138-141
[8]  
HUGHES D, 2003, J NEUROPSYCHIATRY CL, V74, P48
[9]   Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Moore, RA ;
Carroll, D ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Reynolds, DJM ;
Gavaghan, DJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01) :1-12
[10]   Emergency physicians' practices and attitudes regarding procedural anaesthesia for nasogastric tube insertion [J].
Juhl, GA ;
Conners, GP .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 22 (04) :243-245