Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Classification of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Image Quality

被引:34
作者
Cipollari, Stefano [1 ]
Guarrasi, Valerio [2 ]
Pecoraro, Martina [1 ]
Bicchetti, Marco [1 ]
Messina, Emanuele [1 ]
Farina, Lorenzo [2 ]
Paci, Paola [2 ]
Catalano, Carlo [1 ]
Panebianco, Valeria [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Policlin Umberto I, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Comp Control & Management Engn, Rome, Italy
关键词
multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; deep learning; artificial intelligence; quality control; CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27879
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is technically demanding, requiring high image quality to reach its full diagnostic potential. An automated method to identify diagnostically inadequate images could help optimize image quality. Purpose To develop a convolutional neural networks (CNNs) based analysis pipeline for the classification of prostate MRI image quality. Study Type Retrospective. Subjects Three hundred sixteen prostate mpMRI scans and 312 men (median age 67). Field Strength/Sequence A 3 T; fast spin echo T2WI, echo planar imaging DWI, ADC, gradient-echo dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE). Assessment MRI scans were reviewed by three genitourinary radiologists (V.P., M.D.M., S.C.) with 21, 12, and 5 years of experience, respectively. Sequences were labeled as high quality (Q1) or low quality (Q0) and used as the reference standard for all analyses. Statistical Tests Sequences were split into training, validation, and testing sets (869, 250, and 120 sequences, respectively). Inter-reader agreement was assessed with the Fleiss kappa. Following preprocessing and data augmentation, 28 CNNs were trained on MRI slices for each sequence. Model performance was assessed on both a per-slice and a per-sequence basis. A pairwise t-test was performed to compare performances of the classifiers. Results The number of sequences labeled as Q0 or Q1 was 38 vs. 278 for T2WI, 43 vs. 273 for DWI, 41 vs. 275 for ADC, and 38 vs. 253 for DCE. Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for T2WI and DCE and substantial for DWI and ADC. On the per-slice analysis, accuracy was 89.95% +/- 0.02% for T2WI, 79.83% +/- 0.04% for DWI, 76.64% +/- 0.04% for ADC, 96.62% +/- 0.01% for DCE. On the per-sequence analysis, accuracy was 100% +/- 0.00% for T2WI, DWI, and DCE, and 92.31% +/- 0.00% for ADC. The three best algorithms performed significantly better than the remaining ones on every sequence (P-value < 0.05). Data Conclusion CNNs achieved high accuracy in classifying prostate MRI image quality on an individual-slice basis and almost perfect accuracy when classifying the entire sequences. Evidence Level 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 1
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 490
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Image Quality Assessment by Comparing CNN Features between Images [J].
Amirshahi, Seyed Ali ;
Pedersen, Marius ;
Yu, Stella X. .
JOURNAL OF IMAGING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 60 (06)
[2]   Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment [J].
Bosse, Sebastian ;
Maniry, Dominique ;
Mueller, Klaus-Robert ;
Wiegand, Thomas ;
Samek, Wojciech .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2018, 27 (01) :206-219
[3]   Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality [J].
Caglic, Iztok ;
Hansen, Nienke L. ;
Slough, Rhys A. ;
Patterson, Andrew J. ;
Barrett, Tristan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 :174-180
[4]   ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Israel, Bas ;
Tummers, Marcia ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Giganti, Francesco ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Padhani, Anwar ;
Panebianco, Valeria ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Schoots, Ivo ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Walz, Jochen ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (10) :5404-5416
[5]   Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Hamoen, Esther H. J. ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) :343-351
[6]  
Deng J, 2009, PROC CVPR IEEE, P248, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206848
[7]   Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Osses, Daniel F. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04)
[8]   A guide to deep learning in healthcare [J].
Esteva, Andre ;
Robicquet, Alexandre ;
Ramsundar, Bharath ;
Kuleshov, Volodymyr ;
DePristo, Mark ;
Chou, Katherine ;
Cui, Claire ;
Corrado, Greg ;
Thrun, Sebastian ;
Dean, Jeff .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (01) :24-29
[9]   Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial [J].
Giganti, Francesco ;
Allen, Clare ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05) :615-619
[10]  
He K., 2016, P IEEE C COMPUTER VI, DOI [DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90, 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90]