Risk Analysis of Emergency Based on Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning

被引:4
作者
Qiao, Xiaojiao [1 ]
Shi, Dan [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Management, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Business, Panjin, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
国家教育部科学基金资助;
关键词
NATURAL DISASTERS; DECISION-ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; RULE; SUPPORT; MADA;
D O I
10.1155/2019/5453184
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Risk analysis of emergency is vital to effective emergency management. However, conventional analysis is challenged by the emerging problems as risk of emergency appearing increasingly complicated. The risk attributes of emergency originate in complicated sources, and their information is always incomplete. To ensure the efficiency and stability of emergency risk analysis, we proposed an elaborative approach composed of structural description framework and fuzzy evidential reasoning. Firstly, the risk attributes are identified by structural description framework. The information as evidence is obtained and normalized for further analysis. Secondly, risk analysis model with fuzzy evidential reasoning is constructed, and risk grade is evaluated. Finally, a certain railway project accident is taken as an example to test the model and some managerial insights are demonstrated. An approach combining structural description framework and fuzzy evidential reasoning model is feasible and effective; furthermore, it provides stable support for emergency risk analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Sustainability assessment of wastewater reuse alternatives using the evidential reasoning approach [J].
Akhoundi, Ali ;
Nazif, Sara .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 :1350-1376
[2]   OR/MS research in disaster operations management [J].
Altay, Nezih ;
Green, Walter G., III .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 175 (01) :475-493
[3]   Nuclear emergency decision support: A behavioural OR perspective [J].
Argyris, Nikolaos ;
French, Simon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 262 (01) :180-193
[4]   Collaborative scenario modeling in emergency management through cross-impact [J].
Banuls, Victor A. ;
Turoff, Murray ;
Roxanne Hiltz, Starr .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (09) :1756-1774
[5]   A scenario planning approach for the flood emergency logistics preparation problem under uncertainty [J].
Chang, Mei-Shiang ;
Tseng, Ya-Ling ;
Chen, Jing-Wen .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2007, 43 (06) :737-754
[6]   COMPARING COORDINATION STRUCTURES FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN SIX COUNTRIES [J].
Christensen, Tom ;
Danielsen, Ole Andreas ;
Laegreid, Per ;
Rykkja, Lise H. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 94 (02) :316-332
[7]   Pre-disaster planning and post-disaster aid: Examining the impact of the great East Japan Earthquake [J].
Cole, Matthew A. ;
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Okubo, Toshihiro ;
Strobl, Eric .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2017, 21 :291-302
[8]   Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management [J].
Galindo, Gina ;
Batta, Rajan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 230 (02) :201-211
[9]   Natural disaster risk analysis for critical infrastructure systems: An approach based on statistical learning theory [J].
Guikema, Seth D. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (04) :855-860
[10]   Disaster Management from a POM Perspective: Mapping a New Domain [J].
Gupta, Sushil ;
Starr, Martin K. ;
Farahani, Reza Zanjirani ;
Matinrad, Niki .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (10) :1611-1637