Behavioural assessment of pediatric pain

被引:78
作者
Blount, Ronald L. [1 ]
Loiselle, Kristin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Behavioural assessment; Direct observation; Pediatric pain; Rating scale; CHILDRENS DISTRESS; PRELIMINARY VALIDATION; PROCEDURAL DISTRESS; SCALE; DISTRACTION; REDUCTION; PARENT; INTERVENTION; ADOLESCENTS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1155/2009/348184
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Behavioural assessment methods have been used to signal the need for intervention and to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Direct observation and rating scales have been used to assess pain and distress associated with acute medical procedures, postoperative pain, critical care, analogue pain induction procedures and other sources. Two recent scholarly reviews of behavioural assessment methods were conducted by the Society of Pediatric Psychology Evidence-Based Assessment Task Force and the Pediatric Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials, which classified various instruments as well established, approaching well established or promising. The characteristics of the eight behavioural assessment scales that were recommended by one of these task forces are further reviewed in the present paper. The results indicate that behavioural assessment scales have been used flexibly to assess pain in a wide variety of situations, across different pediatric populations and for patients of different ages. In the present review, there appears to be no basis for designating the scales as measures of distress versus pain; both emotional and sensory components of pain seem to be assessed by each of the scales. There is considerable overlap among the behavioural indicators of pain used in the different scales. Furthermore, the behavioural codes indicative of pain may occur before, during and after painful events. Recommendations for future research are provided, including using behavioural assessment to focus on children's coping and adults' behaviours, as well as pain.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Measurement of pain-like response to various NICU stimulants for high-risk infants
    Ahn, Youngmee
    Jun, Yonghoon
    [J]. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 83 (04) : 255 - 262
  • [2] ASSESSING DISTRESS IN PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE ENVIRONMENTS - THE COMFORT SCALE
    AMBUEL, B
    HAMLETT, KW
    MARX, CM
    BLUMER, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 17 (01) : 95 - 109
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1979, Pain, V6, P249
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, OBSERVING INTERACTIO
  • [5] ANALYSIS OF CHILD AND ADULT BEHAVIORAL VARIATIONS BY PHASE OF MEDICAL PROCEDURE
    BLOUNT, RL
    STURGES, JW
    POWERS, SW
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1990, 21 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [6] TRAINING CHILDREN TO COPE AND PARENTS TO COACH THEM DURING ROUTINE IMMUNIZATIONS - EFFECTS ON CHILD, PARENT, AND STAFF BEHAVIORS
    BLOUNT, RL
    BACHANAS, PJ
    POWERS, SW
    COTTER, MC
    FRANKLIN, A
    CHAPLIN, W
    MAYFIELD, J
    HENDERSON, M
    BLOUNT, SD
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1992, 23 (04) : 689 - 705
  • [7] Bridging the gap between explicative and treatment research: A model and practical implications
    Blount, RL
    Bunke, VL
    Zaff, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2000, 7 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [8] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADULTS BEHAVIOR AND CHILD COPING AND DISTRESS DURING BMA LP PROCEDURES - A SEQUENTIAL-ANALYSIS
    BLOUNT, RL
    CORBIN, SM
    STURGES, JW
    WOLFE, VV
    PRATER, JM
    JAMES, LD
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1989, 20 (04) : 585 - 601
  • [9] The child-adult medical procedure interaction scale-revised: An assessment of validity
    Blount, RL
    Cohen, LL
    Frank, NC
    Bachanas, PJ
    Smith, AJ
    Manimala, MR
    Pate, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 22 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [10] Evidence-based assessment of coping and stress in pediatric psychology
    Blount, Ronald L.
    Simons, Laura E.
    Devine, Katie A.
    Jaaniste, Tiina
    Cohen, Lindsey L.
    Chambers, Christine T.
    Hayutin, Lisa G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 33 (09) : 1021 - 1045