Fuzzy Evaluation of Examinees Through Multiple Choice Questions

被引：0
|
作者：
Fahmi, Ali [1 ]
Kahraman, Cengiz [1 ]
机构：
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Management Fac, TR-34367 Istanbul, Turkey
来源：
INFORMATICA | 2017年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词：
evaluation methodologies; multiple choice questions; fuzzy sets; fuzzy examination; fuzzy multiple choice questions; DECISION-MAKING MODEL; OF-THE-ART; STUDENTS EVALUATION; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; MEMBERSHIP FUNCTIONS; SETS; RULES; EDUCATION; NUMBERS; SYSTEM;
D O I：
10.15388/Informatica.2017.148
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Fuzzy sets can be used in many old-fashioned aspects of our lives in order to reach better performance and make fairer judgments. Evaluation through examination is typically conducted by educational centers, and multiple choice question (MCQ) exams are widely applied to score the examinees. Since scoring is potentially a difficult process to judge, we propose to evaluate examinees by fuzzy evaluation method. This method can overcome the main shortcoming of the classical MCQs, i.e. the random selection of the choices. The evaluation of the proposed fuzzy MCQ is more accurate and its ranking of examinees is fairer than classical MCQ.
引用
收藏
页码：609 / 628
页数：20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Educator Training or Experience Affect the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions?
    Webb, Emily M.
    Phuong, Jonathan S.
    Naeger, David M.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) : 1317 - 1322
  • [22] Using multiple response true-false multiple choice questions
    Bandaranayake, R
    Payne, J
    White, S
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 69 (04): : 311 - 315
  • [23] Generating Adequate Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions
    Zhang, Cheng
    Sun, Yicheng
    Chen, Hejia
    Wang, Jie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KDIR), VOL 1, 2020, : 310 - 315
  • [24] Should students change their answers on multiple choice questions?
    Merry, Justin W.
    Elenchin, Mary Kate
    Surma, Renee N.
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2021, 45 (01) : 182 - 190
  • [25] Effect of faculty training on quality of Multiple Choice Questions
    Rauf, Ayesha Rauf
    Sultana, Shafaq
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 46 (02): : 430 - 433
  • [26] Psychometric Analysis for Chemical Kinetics Multiple Choice Questions
    D'Ottone, Luca
    Ochonogor, Enunuwe Chuckunoye
    ORBITAL-THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2019, 11 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [27] Video Enhanced Multiple Choice Questions - Personalising eLearning
    Adams, N.
    Porter, A.
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2016, 24 : 41 - 54
  • [28] A novel approach to generate distractors for Multiple Choice Questions
    Kumar, Archana Praveen
    Nayak, Ashalatha
    Shenoy, K. Manjula
    Goyal, Shashank
    Chaitanya
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 225
  • [29] A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation
    AlFaris, Eiad
    Naeem, Naghma
    Ifran, Farhana
    Qureshi, Riaz
    Saad, Hussain
    Al Sadhan, Ra'ed
    Abdulghani, Hamza Mohammad
    Van der Vleuten, Cees
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2015, 79 (11) : 1305 - 1313
  • [30] An assessment of preclinical removable prosthodontics based on multiple-choice questions: Stakeholders' perceptions
    Shammas, Mohammed
    Nagda, Suhasini
    Shah, Chinmay
    Baxi, Gaurang
    Gadde, Praveen
    Sachdeva, Shabina
    Gupta, Deeksha
    Wali, Othman
    Dhall, Rupinder Singh
    Gajdhar, Shaiq
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 88 (05) : 533 - 543
12345