Government R&D subsidies and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of accounting information quality

被引:64
作者
Zuo, Zhigang [1 ]
Lin, Zhibin [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Accounting, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Durham Univ Business Sch, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE | 2022年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
Innovation policy; R&D subsidy; Accounting information; R&D Investment; Innovation output; Patent; FINANCIAL-REPORTING QUALITY; DEBT MATURITY; CHINA; EFFICIENCY; ADDITIONALITY; COLLABORATION; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; SUPPORT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jik.2022.100176
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The effects of government R&D subsidies can vary across recipient firms, depending on the various character-istics of a firm, potentially including the firm's accounting information quality (AIQ). It has been well recog-nized that high AIQ helps to reduce information asymmetry between investors and firms and, consequently, improves investment efficiency. However, there isa lack of clear understanding about the specific role of cor-porate accounting information in the ex-post effectiveness of government R&D subsidies. This study thus examines the main effects of government R&D subsidies on both firms' R&D inputs and innovation outputs, and the positive moderating role played by the quality of corporate accounting information. The data include 1,561 sample firms listed in the stock markets in China and 11,853 firm-year observations between 2007 and 2015. We find that the moderating effect of AIQ is economically sizable where an improved AIQ (discretion-ary accruals), by a standard deviation, increases the additionality effect by 16% for corporate R&D investment and 4% for the growth of firms' R&D inputs. In addition, we find the subsidies have a stronger favorable effect on firms' R&D outputs (the number of patents) for those firms with a higher AIQ. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espaana,S.L.U
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry
    Abbas, Asad
    Avdic, Anders
    Peng Xiaobao
    Hasan, M. Mahmudul
    Ming, Wan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2019, 4 (01): : 23 - 31
  • [2] Abbas A, 2018, QUAL-ACCESS SUCCESS, V19, P74
  • [3] Assessment of factors affecting innovation policy in biotechnology
    Aghmiuni, Samira Khodi
    Siyal, Saeed
    Wang, Qiang
    Duan, Yuzhen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, 5 (03): : 179 - 189
  • [4] Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms?
    Ahn, Joon Mo
    Lee, Weonvin
    Mortara, Letizia
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
  • [5] Regional dynamics of ownership structure and their impact on firm performance and firm valuation: A case of Chinese listed companies
    Ali, Awais
    Qiang, Fu
    Ashraf, Sadia
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 128 - 146
  • [6] Technology strategies in emerging economies: Emerging issues, challenges and new research agenda
    Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph
    Debrah, Yaw A.
    Yu, Wantao
    Lin, Zhibin
    Danso, Albert
    Adomako, Samuel
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 170
  • [7] Arrow Kenneth J., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024
  • [8] Money for nothing: How firms have financed R&D-projects since the Industrial Revolution
    Bakker, Gerben
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (10) : 1793 - 1814
  • [9] Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs
    Bellucci, Andrea
    Pennacchio, Luca
    Zazzaro, Alberto
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2019, 52 (01) : 213 - 240
  • [10] R&D Subsidies as Dual Signals in Technological Collaborations
    Bianchi, Mattia
    Murtinu, Samuele
    Scalera, Vittoria G.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (09)