Prediction of field winter wheat yield using fewer parameters at middle growth stage by linear regression and the BP neural network method

被引:16
|
作者
Tang, Xiaopei [1 ]
Liu, Haijun [1 ,4 ]
Feng, Dongxue [1 ]
Zhang, Wenjie [2 ]
Chang, Jie [3 ]
Li, Lun [1 ]
Yang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing Key Lab Urban Hydrol Cycle & Sponge City T, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] YingBo Agr Dev Co Ltd, Xingtai 055550, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy & Environm, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, 19,Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Wheat yield prediction; BP neural network; LASSO; North China Plain; Agricultural management; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY; LIMITED IRRIGATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPRING FROST; CALIBRATION; SATELLITE; IMPACTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2022.126621
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Simple and reliable methods for wheat yield forecasting at the field scale are significant for farmers to formulate effective and timely field management and estimate economic revenue. In this study, the linear regression method (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, LASSO) and BP neural network method (back propagation neural network, BPNN) were chosen for field yield prediction. The four variable types considered are climate, soil moisture, crop growth, and flag leaf photosynthesis. Crop-related data were collected in 12 winter wheat varieties that are widely grown in the North China Plain from 2018 to 2021. The same data set was used for both LASSO and BPNN models' development and validation. The results show that models based on LASSO method had the determination coefficient (R2) from 0.23 to 0.78, and the root mean square error (RMSE) from 548 to 1023 kg ha-1, while they were 0.66-0.94 and 302-684 kg ha-1 in models based on the BPNN method. This showed that the BPNN method performed better in field wheat yield prediction than the LASSO method. For BPNN method, using only a single variable at the early grain-filling stage had the similar prediction accuracy to using single or comprehensive variables in multiple growth periods, indicating that the field wheat yield can be predicted earlier by BPNN method with fewer indicators. Last, an optimal field wheat prediction model was developed by the BPNN method using crop growth variables (dry matter and leaf area index) at the early grain-filling stage, with the R2 and RMSE of 0.93 and 288 kg ha-1 in the model development stage, respectively, and correspondingly 0.86 and 481 kg ha-1 in the model validation stage. The significant point of this model is that the field wheat yield can be predicted with only two growth indicators approximately 35 days before harvest for 12 mostly cultivated wheat varieties.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] The Application of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Yield Prediction of Very Early Potato Cultivars before Harvest
    Piekutowska, Magdalena
    Niedbala, Gniewko
    Piskier, Tomasz
    Lenartowicz, Tomasz
    Pilarski, Krzysztof
    Wojciechowski, Tomasz
    Pilarska, Agnieszka A.
    Czechowska-Kosacka, Aneta
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [22] Artificial neural network and regression models for prediction of free-field ground vibration parameters induced from vibroflotation
    Das, Angshuman
    Chakrabortty, Pradipta
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 148
  • [23] CRIME RATE PREDICTION USING HOUSE PROPERTIES VIA ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK VERSUS LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS
    Zhou, Rui
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES (SOCIOINT 2017), 2017, : 1098 - 1105
  • [24] Improved Winter Wheat Spatial Distribution Extraction Using A Convolutional Neural Network and Partly Connected Conditional Random Field
    Wang, Shouyi
    Xu, Zhigang
    Zhang, Chengming
    Zhang, Jinghan
    Mu, Zhongshan
    Zhao, Tianyu
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Gao, Shuai
    Yin, Hao
    Zhang, Ziyun
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [25] Groundwater-level prediction using multiple linear regression and artificial neural network techniques: a comparative assessment
    Sahoo, Sasmita
    Jha, Madan K.
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 21 (08) : 1865 - 1887
  • [26] QUANTIFYING IMPACT OF DROUGHTS ON BARLEY YIELD IN NORTH DAKOTA, USA USING MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
    Odabas, Mehmet Serhat
    Leelaruban, Navaratnam
    Simsek, Halis
    Padmanabhan, G.
    NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2014, 24 (04) : 343 - 355
  • [27] Prediction of Optimal Design Parameters for Reinforced Soil Embankments with Wrapped Faces Using a GA-BP Neural Network
    Dong, Yifei
    Yang, Jun
    Qin, Yiyuan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [28] Temperature field prediction for a PC beam bridge with corrugated steel webs using BP neural network and measured data
    Zhang, Haiping
    Long, Hao
    Chen, Fanghuai
    Luo, Yuan
    Xiao, Xinhui
    Deng, Yang
    Lu, Naiwei
    Liu, Yang
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 68
  • [29] Sugarcane growth prediction based on meteorological parameters using extreme learning machine and artificial neural network
    Ghazvinei, Pezhman Taherei
    Darvishi, Hossein Hassanpour
    Mosavi, Amir
    Yusof, Khamaruzaman bin Wan
    Alizamir, Meysam
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2018, 12 (01) : 738 - 749
  • [30] Prediction of core unmeasurable parameters during loss of coolant accident using deep neural network method
    Moradi, Milad
    Ghafari, Mohsen
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2025, 185