EFFECTS OF PONDEROSA PINE FOREST RESTORATION ON HABITAT FOR BATS

被引:6
|
作者
Johnson, Shelly A. [1 ,2 ]
Chambers, Carol L. [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
SOUTHERN BRITISH-COLUMBIA; CAVITY-NESTING BIRDS; NORTHERN ARIZONA; WESTERN OREGON; ARTIFICIAL ROOSTS; DWELLING BATS; INSECTIVOROUS BATS; BURNING TREATMENTS; DOMINATED FORESTS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3398/064.077.0308
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in the southwestern United States, used by 16 species of bats, are managed with thinning and prescribed fire to restore tree densities and fire regimes to conditions that existed prior to Euro-American settlement. Using 2 approaches (roosting and foraging) to categorize forest habitat for bats, we evaluated how restoration treatments may affect habitat use. We hypothesized that more foraging activity would occur in thinned stands because more species are adapted to open forest, but that more roosts would occur in unthinned stands where snags were unaffected by mechanical treatments and prescribed fire. During the summers of 2006 and 2007, we used acoustic detectors to record call rates of bats as a measure of activity level and compared activity levels among stands that had undergone 3 thinning treatments (light, moderate, and heavy, with 245, 172, or 142 trees per hectare postthinning, respectively) and an unthinned stand as a control (1201 trees per hectare). With radiotelemetry, we located roosts used by reproductive females of 2 common species of forest-associated bats (long-eared myotis, Myotis evotis, and Arizona myotis, Myotis occultus) during summer 2007. We measured roost characteristics at 3 spatial scales (roost, microplot, and surrounding landscape) to contrast between roosts used by Myotis species and randomly selected comparison snags, microplots, and study area landscape. Among thinned and unthinned stands we did not detect a difference in activity levels for all bats (P = 0.2), nor a difference in call rates for Myotis spp. (P = 0.1). However, there was lower activity (P = 0.01) for non-Myotis bats in unthinned compared to thinned stands. This is probably because most non-Myotis species are better adapted to foraging in open forests. Of 24 roosts for long-eared myotis and Arizona myotis, only 31% and 25%, respectively, occurred in thinned stands. Bats selected large-diameter (> 68 cm diameter at breast height) ponderosa pine snags with exfoliating bark. Roosts for Arizona myotis were in areas with elements of old-growth structure, whereas roosts for long-eared myotis occurred in areas similar to stratified, midsuccessional, even-aged forest. Managing for large-diameter ponderosa pine snags and a variety of tree densities and age classes will provide roosting and foraging habitat for bats. We found no distinct "best" treatment to recommend overall, likely because of species differences, with some bats better adapted to opencanopy and some to closed-canopy forest. Maintaining diverse habitat will support a diverse bat assemblage.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 368
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate effects of a wildfire on bats in a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest
    Geluso, K. E. I. T. H.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2022, 82 (03) : 577 - 585
  • [2] Forest restoration in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine
    Lynch, DL
    Romme, WH
    Floyd, ML
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2000, 98 (08) : 17 - 24
  • [3] Modeling ecological restoration effects on ponderosa, pine forest structure
    Covington, WW
    Fulé, PZ
    Hart, SC
    Weaver, RP
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2001, 9 (04) : 421 - 431
  • [4] Restructuring the forest - Goshawks and the restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine
    Long, JN
    Smith, FW
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2000, 98 (08) : 25 - 30
  • [5] Summer Habitat Use by Adult Female Mule Deer in a Restoration-Treated Ponderosa Pine Forest
    Horncastle, Valerie J.
    Yarborough, R. Fenner
    Dickson, Brett G.
    Rosenstock, Steven S.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2013, 37 (04): : 707 - 713
  • [6] Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest
    Mast, JN
    Fulé, PZ
    Moore, MM
    Covington, WW
    Waltz, AEM
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1999, 9 (01) : 228 - 239
  • [7] Financial results of ponderosa pine forest restoration in southwestern Colorado
    Lynch, DL
    PONDEROSA PINE ECOSYSTEMS RESTORATION AND CONSERVATION: STEPS TOWARD STEWARDSHIP, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, (22): : 141 - 148
  • [8] Collaborative restoration effects on forest structure in ponderosa pine- dominated forests of Colorado
    Cannon, Jeffery B.
    Barrett, Kevin J.
    Gannon, Benjamin M.
    Addington, Robert N.
    Battaglia, Mike A.
    Fornwalt, Paula J.
    Aplet, Gregory H.
    Cheng, Antony S.
    Underhill, Jeffrey L.
    Briggs, Jennifer S.
    Brown, Peter M.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 424 : 191 - 204
  • [9] Landscape-scale forest habitat relationships to tassel-eared squirrel populations: Implications for ponderosa pine forest restoration
    Dodd, Norris L.
    Schweinsburg, Raymond E.
    Boe, Susan
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2006, 14 (04) : 537 - 547
  • [10] Habitat associations of the sagebrush lizard (Sceloporus graciosus):: Potential responses of an ectotherm to ponderosa pine forest restoration treatments
    Knox, SC
    Chambers, C
    Germaine, SS
    PONDEROSA PINE ECOSYSTEMS RESTORATION AND CONSERVATION: STEPS TOWARD STEWARDSHIP, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, (22): : 95 - 98