Comparison of long-term outcomes from rib fractures for patients undergoing both operative and non-operative management: a survey analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Bauman, Zachary Mitchel [1 ]
Visenio, Michael [1 ]
Patel, Megha [1 ]
Sprigman, Connor [1 ]
Raposo-Hadley, Ashley [1 ]
Pieper, Collin [1 ]
Holloway, Micah [1 ]
Orcutt, Gunnar [1 ]
Cemaj, Samuel [1 ]
Evans, Charity [1 ]
Cantrell, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Emergency Gen Surg Crit Care Surg, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
关键词
Rib fractures; Surgical stabilization of rib fractures; Long-term outcomes; Survey; TRAUMATIC FLAIL CHEST; SURGICAL STABILIZATION; FIXATION; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-022-01900-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been gaining popularity for the treatment of rib fractures. Limited literature exists regarding the long-term effects of SSRF versus non-operative (NO) intervention. The goal of this study is to better understand these long-term effects, hypothesizing SSRF patients have better outcomes. Methods IRB approved survey study at our Level I trauma center. Patients suffering rib fractures from 1/2017 through 1/2019 were surveyed via phone call and asked five questions. Basic demographics obtained. The five survey questions asked: "Are you still experiencing pain from your rib fractures?"; "If yes, how would you rate your pain 1-10?"; "Are you back to your baseline activity level?"; "If no, is this related to your rib fractures?"; "Do you feel your rib fractures moving/clicking?" Paired t test, Chi square, and median tests were utilized. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results 527 patients were called with 228 unsuccessfully reached. 47 refused to participate. 252 patients (47.8%) participated in the survey; 78 SSRF and 174 NO. Age and gender were similar between cohorts. Majority of patients suffered blunt trauma. No significant difference between ISS; 15 SSRF vs 14 NO. SSRF patients had worse chest trauma with median chest AIS of 3 (IQR 3-4) vs 3 (IQR 3-3) for NO (p < 0.001). Response to survey questions revealed similar incidences of pain between SSRF and NO cohorts (28.2% vs 27.6%; p = 0.939), however decreased pain scores for SSRF group (2 vs 4; p = 0.006). Return to baseline activity was better for the SSRF group (75.6% vs 56.3%; p = 0.143) and the incidence of rib fractures being the reason for patients not returning to baseline was decreased (26.3% vs 44.7%; p = 0.380). Lastly, SSRF resulted in significantly less movement of rib fractures (3.8% vs 13.8%; p = 0.031). Conclusion Patients who undergo SSRF show significant long-term improvements in pain scores and better return to baseline function with less overall issues from their rib fractures compared to those managed non-operatively.
引用
收藏
页码:3299 / 3304
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Echocardiographic Changes and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated With Bosentan for 72 Weeks: A Post-hoc Analysis From the FUTURE 3 Study
    Beghetti, Maurice
    Berger, Rolf M. F.
    Bonnet, Damien
    Grill, Simon
    Lesage, Catherine
    Lemarie, Jean-Christophe
    Ivy, D. Dunbar
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 9
  • [42] Long-term survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer are more favorable than thoracotomy: a propensity score-matched analysis from a high-volume center in China
    Mei, Jiandong
    Guo, Chenglin
    Xia, Liang
    Liao, Hu
    Pu, Qiang
    Ma, Lin
    Liu, Chengwu
    Zhu, Yunke
    Lin, Fang
    Yang, Zhenyu
    Zhao, Kejia
    Che, Guowei
    Liu, Lunxu
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (02) : 155 - 166
  • [43] Timing of Angiography With a Routine Invasive Strategy and Long-Term Outcomes in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Patient Data From the FRISC II (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease), ICTUS (Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes), and RITA-3 (Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Patients With Unstable Angina or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Trials
    Damman, Peter
    van Geloven, Nan
    Wallentin, Lars
    Lagerqvist, Bo
    Fox, Keith A. A.
    Clayton, Tim
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    Hirsch, Alexander
    Windhausen, Fons
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (02) : 191 - 199