Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: results of a multicenter, randomized, phase III trial (GAPSO study)

被引:13
作者
Dai, Yu-Hong [1 ]
Yu, Xiong-Jie [2 ]
Xu, Hui-Ting [3 ]
Zhuang, Liang [1 ]
Zhang, Ming-Sheng [1 ]
Zou, Yan-Mei [1 ]
Fu, Qiang [1 ]
Qiu, Hong [1 ]
Yuan, Xiang-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Oncol, 1095 Jie Fang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Shiyan Renmin Hosp, Dept Oncol, Shiyan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Canc Hosp, Dept Oncol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
advanced gastric cancer; clinical trial; nab-paclitaxel; oxaliplatin; S-1; OPEN-LABEL; THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMBINATION; CISPLATIN; NIVOLUMAB; EFFICACY; JUNCTION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1177/17588359221118020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to investigate the superiority of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) over oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, phase III superiority trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 130 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8; oral S-1 40-60 mg twice daily for 14 days) or SOX (130 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin on day 1; oral S-1 40-60 mg twice daily for 14 days) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Results: Owing to slow enrolment, an unplanned interim analysis was performed, resulting in the early termination of the study on 31 December 2021 (data cutoff). Between March 2019 and March 2021, 97 patients (AS, n = 48; SOX, n = 49) were treated and evaluated for efficacy and safety of AS and SOX. As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up was 23.13 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.39-32.87]. The median PFS was 9.03 months (95% CI, 6.50-11.56) in the AS group and 5.07 months (95% CI, 4.33-5.81) in the SOX group, demonstrating a better PFS tendency following AS treatment than SOX treatment (hazard ratio = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94; p = 0.03). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia in both groups, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia in the SOX group. Conclusion: Although this study was terminated early, the results demonstrated a better PFS tendency in patients with AGC who were treated with AS than in those treated with SOX, with controllable toxicities.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study [J].
Abraha, Iosief ;
Cherubini, Antonio ;
Cozzolino, Francesco ;
De Florio, Rita ;
Luchetta, Maria Laura ;
Rimland, Joseph M. ;
Folletti, Ilenia ;
Marchesi, Mauro ;
Germani, Antonella ;
Orso, Massimiliano ;
Eusebi, Paolo ;
Montedori, Alessandro .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
[2]   Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review [J].
Abraha, Iosief ;
Montedori, Alessandro .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :33
[3]   Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016 [J].
Ajani, Jaffer A. ;
D'Amico, Thomas A. ;
Almhanna, Khaldoun ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Chao, Joseph ;
Das, Prajnan ;
Denlinger, Crystal S. ;
Fanta, Paul ;
Farjah, Farhood ;
Fuchs, Charles S. ;
Gerdes, Hans ;
Gibson, Michael ;
Glasgow, Robert E. ;
Hayman, James A. ;
Hochwald, Steven ;
Hofstetter, Wayne L. ;
Ilson, David H. ;
Jaroszewski, Dawn ;
Johung, Kimberly L. ;
Keswani, Rajesh N. ;
Kleinberg, Lawrence R. ;
Korn, W. Michael ;
Leong, Stephen ;
Linn, Catherine ;
Lockhart, A. Craig ;
Ly, Quan P. ;
Mulcahy, Mary F. ;
Orringer, Mark B. ;
Perry, Kyle A. ;
Poultsides, George A. ;
Scott, Walter J. ;
Strong, Vivian E. ;
Washington, Mary Kay ;
Weksler, Benny ;
Willett, Christopher G. ;
Wright, Cameron D. ;
Zelman, Debra ;
McMillian, Nicole ;
Sundar, Hema .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2016, 14 (10) :1286-1312
[4]   S-1 combined with paclitaxel may benefit advanced gastric cancer: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bian, Ning-ning ;
Wang, Yong-hong ;
Min, Guang-tao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 62 :34-43
[5]   Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with S-1/capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: interim results of a randomized, phase II trial (ATTRACTION-4) [J].
Boku, N. ;
Ryu, M. -H. ;
Kato, K. ;
Chung, H. C. ;
Minashi, K. ;
Lee, K. -W. ;
Cho, H. ;
Kang, W. K. ;
Komatsu, Y. ;
Tsuda, M. ;
Yamaguchi, K. ;
Hara, H. ;
Fumita, S. ;
Azuma, M. ;
Chen, L. -T. ;
Kang, Y. -K. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (02) :250-258
[6]   Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology - The functional assessment of cancer therapy-taxane (FACT-taxane) [J].
Cella, D ;
Peterman, A ;
Hudgens, S ;
Webster, K ;
Socinski, MA .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (04) :822-831
[7]   Taxane-induced neurotoxicity: Pathophysiology and therapeutic perspectives [J].
da Costa, Robson ;
Passos, Giselle F. ;
Quintao, Nara L. M. ;
Fernandes, Elizabeth S. ;
Maia, Joao Raphael L. C. B. ;
Campos, Maria Martha ;
Calixto, Joao B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 177 (14) :3127-3146
[8]   A multicenter randomized phase III study of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with S-1 (AS) versus oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GAPSO study) [J].
Dai, Yuhong ;
Yu, Xiongjie ;
Xu, Huiting ;
Zhuang, Liang ;
Zhang, Mingsheng ;
Zou, Yanmei ;
Fu, Qiang ;
Qiu, Hong ;
Yuan, Xianglin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04)
[9]  
Desai N, 2016, ALBUMIN MED PATHOLOG, P101
[10]   National trend of gastric cancer mortality in China (2003-2015): a population-based study [J].
Gao, Kun ;
Wu, Jun .
CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 39