Brentuximab vedotin for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation

被引:17
作者
Kaloyannidis, Panayotis [1 ]
Hertzberg, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Webb, Kate [4 ]
Zomas, Athanasios [5 ]
Schrover, Rudolf [6 ]
Hurst, Michael [7 ]
Jacob, Ian [7 ]
Nikoglou, Thalia [5 ]
Connors, Joseph M. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] King Fahad Specialist Hosp, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[2] Prince Wales Hosp, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ NSW, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[4] Takeda Pharmaceut, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Takeda Europe & Canada Business Unit EUCAN, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] SYNEVi Pty Ltd, Chatswood, NSW, Australia
[7] Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res Ltd, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[8] BC Canc Ctr Lymphoid Canc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Hodgkin lymphoma; recurrence; autologous stem cell transplant; brentuximab vedotin; survival analysis; DISEASE; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/bjh.16201
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is the first approved novel agent for salvage treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In this study, a literature-based analysis was undertaken to assess, via an indirect treatment comparison, the comparative efficacy of BV to salvage chemotherapy as treatment for R/R cHL patients following ASCT. This comparative effectiveness research was undertaken to support a reimbursement submission for BV to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Retrospective analysis of individual patient data from four data sources demonstrated that the use of BV as first salvage treatment in cHL patients relapsing or progressing post-ASCT achieved improvements in both clinical response and overall survival. More specifically, BV was associated with an incremental improvement of 22% in overall response rate compared to salvage chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 92 center dot 2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 85 center dot 5-99 center dot 3%] and 32 center dot 2% (95% CI: 19 center dot 1-54 center dot 6%) respectively for BV, compared to 30 center dot 5% (95% CI: 22 center dot 2-42 center dot 0%) and 3 center dot 2% (95% CI: 1 center dot 1-8 center dot 9%) respectively for salvage chemotherapy. The encouraging results from this conservative analysis have the potential to support informed clinical management and funding decisions for the first salvage of cHL patients demonstrating recurrence after ASCT.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 549
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, 2016, GUID PREP SUBM PHARM
[22]  
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, 2016, PUBL SUMM DOC NOV 20
[23]   Gemcitabine in the treatment of refractory Hodgkins's disease: Results of a multicenter phase II study [J].
Santoro, A ;
Bredenfeld, H ;
Devizzi, L ;
Tesch, H ;
Bonfante, V ;
Viviani, S ;
Fielder, F ;
Parra, HS ;
Benoehr, C ;
Pacini, M ;
Bonadonna, G ;
Diehl, V .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (13) :2615-2619
[24]   Allogeneic transplantation improves the overall and progression-free survival of Hodgkin lymphoma patients relapsing after autologous transplantation: a retrospective study based on the time of HLA typing and donor availability [J].
Sarina, Barbara ;
Castagna, Luca ;
Farina, Lucia ;
Patriarca, Francesca ;
Benedetti, Fabio ;
Carella, Angelo M. ;
Falda, Michele ;
Guidi, Stefano ;
Ciceri, Fabio ;
Bonini, Alessandro ;
Ferrari, Samantha ;
Malagola, Michele ;
Morello, Enrico ;
Milone, Giuseppe ;
Bruno, Benedetto ;
Mordini, Nicola ;
Viviani, Simonetta ;
Levis, Alessandro ;
Giordano, Laura ;
Santoro, Armando ;
Corradini, Paolo .
BLOOD, 2010, 115 (18) :3671-3677
[25]   Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin's disease:: a randomised trial [J].
Schmitz, N ;
Pfistner, B ;
Sextro, M ;
Sieber, M ;
Carella, AM ;
Haenel, M ;
Boissevain, F ;
Zschaber, R ;
Müller, P ;
Kirchner, H ;
Lohri, A ;
Decker, S ;
Koch, B ;
Hasenclever, D ;
Goldstone, AH ;
Diehl, V .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9323) :2065-2071
[26]  
SMC, 2014, 84512 SMC
[27]   Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment [J].
Sutton, Alex ;
Ades, A. E. ;
Cooper, Nicola ;
Abrams, Keith .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (09) :753-767
[28]   The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms [J].
Swerdlow, Steven H. ;
Campo, Elias ;
Pileri, Stefano A. ;
Harris, Nancy Lee ;
Stein, Harald ;
Siebert, Reiner ;
Advani, Ranjana ;
Ghielmini, Michele ;
Salles, Gilles A. ;
Zelenetz, Andrew D. ;
Jaffe, Elaine S. .
BLOOD, 2016, 127 (20) :2375-2390
[29]  
Yurchenko M., 2010, Experimental Oncology, V32, P214