FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

被引:359
|
作者
Foster, Norman L.
Heidebrink, Judith L.
Clark, Christopher M.
Jagust, William J.
Arnold, Steven E.
Barbas, Nancy R.
DeCarli, Charles S.
Turner, R. Scott
Koeppe, Robert A.
Higdon, Roger
Minoshima, Satoshi
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Ctr Alzheimers Care Imaging Res, Dept Neurol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Ann Arbor Vet Adm Hosp, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Penn, Alzheimers Dis Ctr, Inst Aging, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurosci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] BIATECH Inst, Washington, DC USA
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; PET; FDG; frontotemporal dementia;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awm177
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Distinguishing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) currently relies on a clinical history and examination, but positron emission tomography with [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) shows different patterns of hypometabolism in these disorders that might aid differential diagnosis. Six dementia experts with variable FDG-PET experience made independent, forced choice, diagnostic decisions in 45 patients with pathologically confirmed AD (n = 31) or FTD (n = 14) using five separate methods: (1) review of clinical summaries, (2) a diagnostic checklist alone, (3) summary and checklist, (4) transaxial FDG-PET scans and (5) FDG-PET stereotactic surface projection (SSP) metabolic and statistical maps. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the sequential review of a clinical summary followed by SSP. Visual interpretation of SSP images was superior to clinical assessment and had the best inter-rater reliability (mean kappa = 0.78) and diagnostic accuracy (89.6%). It also had the highest specificity (97.6%) and sensitivity (86%), and positive likelihood ratio for FTD (36.5). The addition of FDG-PET to clinical summaries increased diagnostic accuracy and confidence for both AD and FTD. It was particularly helpful when raters were uncertain in their clinical diagnosis. Visual interpretation of FDG-PET after brief training is more reliable and accurate in distinguishing FTD from AD than clinical methods alone. FDG-PET adds important information that appropriately increases diagnostic confidence, even among experienced dementia specialists.
引用
收藏
页码:2616 / 2635
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Brain FDG-PET in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia in the clinical setting
    Rubi, S.
    Tarongi, S.
    Vasquez, D.
    Garcia, A.
    Vico, H.
    Noguera, A.
    Sampol, C.
    Gimenez, M.
    Mas, A.
    Picado, M. J.
    Pena, C.
    Amer, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S340 - S340
  • [2] Discrepant FDG-PET and Neuropathological Findings in Patients Scanned to Distinguish Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer's Disease Dementia
    Foster, Norman
    Wang, Angela Y.
    King, Richard
    Zamrini, Edward
    Yachnis, Anthony
    Chin, Steven
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 33 : 153 - 154
  • [3] Exosomal HSP70 for Monitoring of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical and FDG-PET Correlation
    Chanteloup, Gaetan
    Cordonnier, Marine
    Moreno-Ramos, Teresa
    Pytel, Vanesa
    Matias-Guiu, Jorge
    Gobbo, Jessica
    Nieves Cabrera-Martin, Maria
    Gomez-Pinedo, Ulises
    Garrido, Carmen
    Matias-Guiu, Jordi A.
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2019, 71 (04) : 1263 - 1269
  • [4] Validating FDG-PET as a biomarker for frontotemporal dementia
    Foster, NL
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2003, 184 : S2 - S8
  • [5] Automatic classification of Alzheimer's disease vs. Frontotemporal dementia: A spatial decision tree approach with FDG-PET
    Sadeghi, N.
    Foster, N. L.
    Wang, A. Y.
    Minoshima, S.
    Lieberman, A. P.
    Tasdizen, T.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 408 - +
  • [6] May FDG-PET imaging be predicted by comprehensive neuropsychological assesment in Alzheimer's disease and Frontotemporal dementia? A machine learning study
    Dauden Onate, P.
    Garcia-Gutierrez, F.
    Diaz-Alvarez, J.
    Bueso-Inchausti, P.
    Cabrera-Martin, M.
    Delgado-Alonso, C.
    Delgado-Alvarez, A.
    Diez-Cirarda, M.
    Valls-Carbo, A.
    Fernandez-Romero, L.
    Valles-Salgado, M.
    Matias-Guiu, J.
    Pena-Casanova, J.
    Ayala, J.
    Matias-Guiu, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 : S637 - S637
  • [7] Adding FDG-PET to clinical history and examination improves the accuracy of dementia diagnosis
    Foster, NL
    Barbas, NR
    Heidebrink, JL
    Turner, RS
    Clark, CM
    Jagust, WJ
    Arnold, SE
    DeCarli, CS
    Koeppe, RA
    Higdon, R
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 : S372 - S372
  • [8] Assessment of Parkinson's disease with dementia by FDG-PET
    Higashi, Y.
    Kamada, H.
    Tabata, M.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (07) : S319 - S319
  • [9] The use of advanced imaging software applications with FDG-PET to differentiate Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia in an academic clinical setting
    Horn, Kevin
    Beardmore, Britney
    Burrell, Lance
    Foster, Norman
    Hoffman, John
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [10] The use of advanced imaging software applications with FDG-PET to differentiate Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia in an academic clinical setting
    Horn, Kevin
    Beardmore, Britney
    Burrell, Lance
    Foster, Norman
    Hoffman, John
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55