Foreperiod priming in temporal preparation: Testing current models of sequential effects

被引:27
作者
Capizzi, Mariagrazia [1 ]
Correa, Angel [1 ]
Wojtowicz, Alex [2 ]
Rafal, Robert D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Bangor Univ, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
Time; Foreperiod; Trace-conditioning; Dual-process; Non-aging distribution; Catch trials; SIMPLE REACTION-TIME; ATTENTION; UNCERTAINTY; STIMULUS; DISSOCIATIONS; INFORMATION; INHIBITION; RHYTHMS; DRIVEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sequential foreperiod effects in temporal preparation are typically asymmetric such that a previous experience of preparation has a strong impact on participants' responses to a forthcoming target stimulus presented at the current short rather than at the current long foreperiod. The trace-conditioning model explains this asymmetry by an automatic process of trace-conditioning, which is sufficient and independent from a strategic process of conditional probability monitoring considered by the dual-process model. The present study contrasted trace-conditioning and dual-process models in three experiments that employed a non-aging distribution to keep conditional probability of target occurrence constant across foreperiod durations. In Experiment 1 (no catch trials), the typical pattern of asymmetric sequential effects was replicated, whereas in Experiments 2 and 3 (25% and 50% of catch trials, respectively) the results showed shorter RTs when previous and current foreperiods were repeated rather than alternated for both current short and long foreperiods. These results are discussed in relation to the two most influential models of sequential effects and to a novel account based on repetition priming. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 49
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Temporal orienting of attention is interfered by concurrent working memory updating
    Capizzi, Mariagrazia
    Correa, Angel
    Sanabria, Daniel
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2013, 51 (02) : 326 - 339
  • [2] Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation
    Capizzi, Mariagrazia
    Sanabria, Daniel
    Correa, Angel
    [J]. COGNITION, 2012, 123 (02) : 293 - 302
  • [3] CONDITIONS FOR USE OF VERBAL ASSOCIATIONS
    COFER, CN
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1967, 68 (01) : 1 - &
  • [4] The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting:: determinants and attributes
    Correa, A
    Lupiáñez, J
    Tudela, P
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [5] Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks
    Correa, A
    Lupiáñez, J
    Milliken, B
    Tudela, P
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2004, 66 (02): : 264 - 278
  • [6] Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity
    Correa, Angel
    Trivino, Monica
    Perez-Duenas, Carolina
    Acosta, Alberto
    Lupianez, Juan
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2010, 73 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [7] Neural Substrates of Mounting Temporal Expectation
    Coull, Jennifer T.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (08):
  • [8] Coull JT, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7426
  • [9] Temporal preparation driven by rhythms is resistant to working memory interference
    Dolores de la Rosa, Maria
    Sanabria, Daniel
    Capizzi, Mariagrazia
    Correa, Angel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
  • [10] EFFECTS OF FOREPERIOD, FOREPERIOD VARIABILITY, AND PROBABILITY OF STIMULUS OCCURRENCE ON SIMPLE REACTION-TIME
    DRAZIN, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 62 (01): : 43 - &