High-quality endoscope reprocessing decreases endoscope contamination

被引:25
|
作者
Decristoforo, P. [1 ]
Kaltseis, J. [1 ]
Fritz, A. [1 ]
Edlinger, M. [2 ]
Posch, W. [1 ]
Wilflingseder, D. [1 ]
Lass-Floerl, C. [1 ]
Orth-Hoeller, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Div Hyg & Med Microbiol, Schopfstr 41, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Med Stat Informat & Hlth Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Automated endoscope reprocessor; Contamination; Gastrointestinal endoscope; Guideline; High-level disinfection; Microbiological surveillance; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; TRANSMISSION; INFECTION; SURVEILLANCE; COLONOSCOPY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.017
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Several outbreaks of severe infections due to contamination of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes, mainly duodenoscopes, have been described. The rate of microbial endoscope contamination varies dramatically in literature. The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to evaluate the hygiene quality of endoscopes and automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) in Tyrol/Austria. Methods: In 2015 and 2016, a total of 463 GI endoscopes and 105 AERs from 29 endoscopy centres were analysed by a routine (R) and a combined routine and advanced (CRA) sampling procedure and investigated for microbial contamination by culture-based and molecular-based analyses. Results: The contamination rate of GI endoscopes was 1.3%-4.6% according to the national guideline, suggesting that 1.3-4.6 patients out of 100 could have had contacts with hygiene-relevant microorganisms through an endoscopic intervention. Comparison of R and CRA sampling showed 1.8% of R versus 4.6% of CRA failing the acceptance criteria in phase I and 1.3% of R versus 3.0% of CRA samples failing in phase II. The most commonly identified indicator organism was Pseudomonas spp., mainly Pseudomonas oleovorans. None of the tested viruses were detected in 40 samples. While AERs in phase I failed (n = 9, 17.6%) mainly due to technical faults, phase II revealed lapses (n = 6, 11.5%) only on account of microbial contamination of the last rinsing water, mainly with Pseudomonas spp. Conclusions: In the present study the contamination rate of endoscopes was low compared with results from other European countries, possibly due to the high quality of endoscope reprocessing, drying and storage. (c) 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1101.e1 / 1101.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing
    Ma, Su
    Feng, Lili
    Jiang, Ziyi
    Gao, Xian
    Long, Xisha
    Zhuang, Shaonan
    Ding, Wenxia
    Chen, Taiyao
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Zhang, Lingjuan
    Xi, Huijun
    Zhang, Hongzhi
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [42] Assessment of endoscope reprocessing at World Gastroenterology Organisation training centers using adenosine triphosphate testing
    Visrodia, Kavel
    Jones, Dianne
    Jennings, Melissa
    Conway, Catherine
    Burgos, Herbert
    Malani, Jioji
    Ogutu, Elly
    Pausawasdi, Nonthalee
    Sabbagh, Luis
    Leddin, Desmond
    Kassmeyer, Blake
    Lennon, Ryan J.
    Topazian, Mark D.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (01) : E68 - E77
  • [43] A nationwide survey on the effectiveness of training on endoscope reprocessing within the national cancer screening program in Korea
    Shin, Hye Young
    Jang, Da Hun
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2021, 49 (08) : 1031 - 1035
  • [44] Prion disease and recommended procedures for flexible endoscope reprocessing - a review of policies worldwide and proposal for a simplified approach
    Kampf, G.
    Jung, M.
    Suchomel, M.
    Saliou, P.
    Griffiths, H.
    Vos, C.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2020, 104 (01) : 92 - 110
  • [45] Analysis of an improved workflow of endoscope reprocessing for bedside endoscopic diagnosis and treatment on COVID-19 patients
    Gu Qing
    Wang Hua-fen
    Fang Ying
    Lu Ye
    Shen Zhe
    Wang Yan
    Wu Xin
    Cen Li
    Chen Yi-shu
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2020, 21 (05): : 416 - 422
  • [46] The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing
    Vickery, Karen
    Ngo, Quan-D.
    Zou, Jean
    Cossart, Yvonne E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2009, 37 (06) : 470 - 475
  • [47] Swab culture monitoring of automated endoscope reprocessors after high-level disinfection
    Lung-Sheng Lu
    Yi-Chun Chiu
    Ming-Tzung Lin
    Tsung-Hui Hu
    King-Wah Chiu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, (14) : 1660 - 1663
  • [48] Swab culture monitoring of automated endoscope reprocessors after high-level disinfection
    Lu, Lung-Sheng
    Wu, Keng-Liang
    Chiu, Yi-Chun
    Lin, Ming-Tzung
    Hu, Tsung-Hui
    Chiu, King-Wah
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (14) : 1660 - 1663
  • [49] Endoscope reprocessing: Comparison of drying effectiveness and microbial levels with an automated drying and storage cabinet with forced filtered air and a standard storage cabinet
    Perumpail, Ryan B.
    Marya, Neil B.
    McGinty, Betty L.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2019, 47 (09) : 1083 - 1089
  • [50] Occupational hazards associated with endoscope high-level disinfection: Case vignettes, review of literature and recommendations for mitigation
    Mobo, B. H.
    Foster, L. A.
    Rabesa, M. J.
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2014, 48 (02): : 255 - 260