INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF SERVICE ORGANIZATION IN REHABILITATION: AN UPDATED SET OF CATEGORIES (ICSO-R 2.0)

被引:32
作者
Gutenbrunner, Christoph [1 ]
Nugraha, Boya [1 ]
Gimigliano, Francesca [2 ]
Meyer, Thorsten [3 ]
Kiekens, Carlotte [4 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Rehabil Med, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30627 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Mental & Phys Hlth & Prevent Med, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Bielefeld, Sch Publ Hlth, Bielefeld, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Leuven, Phys & Rehabil Med, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
health-related rehabilitation; service organization; rehabilitation; health system; health service; classification; HOSPITALS; MEDICINE; ISPRM;
D O I
10.2340/16501977-2627
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a revised version of the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R). Design: Qualitative study. Methods: The revision was based on testing the first version of the ICSO-R; 2 discussion rounds invited by the ICSO-R working group of the Standardized Rehabilitation Reporting Subcommittee of the World Health Organization Liaison committee of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, and a call for corrections from a group of international experts. Results: The resulting ICSO-R 2.0 version is composed of 2 dimensions (formerly 3); the Provider dimension and the Service delivery dimension. The categories of the Funding dimension from the first version of ICSO-R were incorporated into each of the other dimensions. The Provider dimension now consists of 9 categories and the Service delivery dimension consists of 14 categories. Subcategories have been added to 7 categories: governance/leadership, funding of provider, target groups, location of service delivery, setting, rehabilitation team, and funding of service delivery. Conclusion: This updated version of ICSO-R provides a prerequisite for rehabilitation service organization assessment and implementation projects, reporting of contextual influences in clinical trials and many other aspects. In addition, ICSO-R 2.0 can be used for several purposes, e.g. to analyse and compare the provision of rehabilitation services in health systems and to support the quality management of rehabilitation services. However, the development of value sets for each (sub)category and further validation studies are still needed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Person-centred rehabilitation: what exactly does it mean? Protocol for a scoping review with thematic analysis towards framing the concept and practice of person-centred rehabilitation
    Jesus, Tiago S.
    Bright, Felicity
    Kayes, Nicola
    Cott, Cheryl A.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07):
  • [22] European initiative for the application of the International Classification of Service Organzation in Health-related Rehabilitation (ICSO-R)
    Kiekens, Carlotte
    Meyer, Thorsten
    Gimigliano, Francesca
    Baffone, Cristiana
    Gutenbrunner, Christoph M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (02) : 308 - 318
  • [23] Quality management and perceptions of teamwork and safety climate in European hospitals
    Kristensen, Solvejg
    Hammer, Antje
    Bartels, Paul
    Sunol, Rosa
    Groene, Oliver
    Thompson, Caroline A.
    Arah, Onyebuchi A.
    Kutaj-Wasikowska, Halina
    Michel, Philippe
    Wagner, Cordula
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 27 (06) : 499 - 506
  • [24] ISPRM DISCUSSION PAPER: PROPOSING A CONCEPTUAL DESCRIPTION OF HEALTH-RELATED REHABILITATION SERVICES
    Meyer, Thorsten
    Gutenbrunner, Christoph
    Kiekens, Carlotte
    Skempes, Dimitrios
    Melvin, John L.
    Schedler, Kuno
    Imamura, Marta
    Stucki, Gerold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [25] Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
    Moore, Graham F.
    Audrey, Suzanne
    Barker, Mary
    Bond, Lyndal
    Bonell, Chris
    Hardeman, Wendy
    Moore, Laurence
    O'Cathain, Alicia
    Tinati, Tannaze
    Wight, Daniel
    Baird, Janis
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [26] Variation in access to community rehabilitation services and length of stay in hospital following a hip fracture: a cross-sectional study
    Neuburger, Jenny
    Harding, Karen A.
    Bradley, Rachel J. D.
    Cromwell, David A.
    Gregson, Celia L.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (09):
  • [27] Developing standards for reporting implementation studies of complex interventions (StaRI): a systematic review and e-Delphi
    Pinnock, Hilary
    Epiphaniou, Eleni
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Griffiths, Chris
    Eldridge, Sandra
    Craig, Peter
    Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [28] THE CHALLENGES OF DESCRIBING REHABILITATION SERVICES: A DISCUSSION PAPER
    Roe, Cecilie
    Kirkevold, Marit
    Andelic, Nada
    Soberg, Helene L.
    Sveen, Unni
    Bautz-Holter, Erik
    Jahnsen, Reidun
    van Walsem, Marleen R.
    Bragstad, Line K.
    Hjelle, Ellen G.
    Klevberg, Gunvor
    Oretorp, Per
    Habberstad, Andreas
    Hagfors, Jon
    Vaehle, Randi
    Engen, Grace
    Gutenbrunner, Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 50 (02) : 151 - 158
  • [29] Clinical leadership and hospital performance: assessing the evidence base
    Sarto, F.
    Veronesi, G.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16
  • [30] Selb M, 2019, EUR J PHYS REHABIL M