ESAS and FACT-B in eribulin-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a multicenter, prospective and observational study

被引:3
作者
Moscetti, Luca [1 ,7 ]
Mentuccia, Lucia [2 ]
Vici, Patrizia [3 ]
Quadrini, Silvia [2 ]
Sperduti, Isabella [4 ]
Pizzuti, Laura [3 ]
Fabbri, Maria Agnese [1 ]
Vaccaro, Angela [2 ]
Sacca, Marcello Maugeri [3 ,6 ]
Barba, Maddalena [3 ,6 ]
Sergi, Domenico [3 ]
Zampa, Germano [5 ]
Gamucci, Teresa [2 ]
机构
[1] Belcolle Hosp, AUSL Viterbo, Div Med Oncol, Viterbo, Italy
[2] ASL Frosinone, Med Oncol Unit, Frosinone, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Div Med Oncol B, Rome, Italy
[4] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Biostat, Rome, Italy
[5] Nuovo Regina Margherita Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Rome, Italy
[6] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Sci Direct, Rome, Italy
[7] Azienda Osped Univ Policlin Modena, Dept Oncol & Hematol, Modena, Italy
关键词
Edmonton symptoms assessment scale; eribulin mesylate; metastatic breast cancer; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CAPECITABINE; MESYLATE; SCALE;
D O I
10.2217/fon-2017-0062
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Quality of life (QoL) is a critical issue for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eribulin mesylate represents a novel and active drug for pretreated MBC. Regretfully, few data exploring health-related (HR) QoL are available in unselected populations. Patients & methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in 50 MBC patients treated with eribulin mesylate, in order to evaluate HRQoL and patients' well-being by using the Edmonton symptoms assessment scale (ESAS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast questionnaires. Results: A significant ESAS score improvement was observed with a 10% median decrease. No differences were revealed for the QoL scores. Conclusion: The analysis of ESAS and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scores showed that eribulin mesylate contributes to preserve QoL in MBC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1525
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting [J].
Basch, Ethan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (10) :865-869
[2]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[3]  
Bruera E, 1991, J Palliat Care, V7, P6
[4]   1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1) [J].
Cardoso, F. ;
Costa, A. ;
Norton, L. ;
Cameron, D. ;
Cufer, T. ;
Fallowfield, L. ;
Francis, P. ;
Gligorov, J. ;
Kyriakides, S. ;
Lin, N. ;
Pagani, O. ;
Senkus, E. ;
Thomssen, C. ;
Aapro, M. ;
Bergh, J. ;
Di Leo, A. ;
El Saghir, N. ;
Ganz, P. A. ;
Gelmon, K. ;
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Harbeck, N. ;
Houssami, N. ;
Hudis, C. ;
Kaufman, B. ;
Leadbeater, M. ;
Mayer, M. ;
Rodger, A. ;
Rugo, H. ;
Sacchini, V. ;
Sledge, G. ;
van't Veer, L. ;
Viale, G. ;
Krop, I. ;
Winer, E. .
BREAST, 2012, 21 (03) :242-252
[5]   Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial [J].
Cortes, Javier ;
Hudgens, Stacie ;
Twelves, Chris ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Awada, Ahmad ;
Yelle, Louise ;
McCutcheon, Susan ;
Kaufman, Peter A. ;
Forsythe, Anna ;
Velikova, Galina .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 154 (03) :509-520
[6]   Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study [J].
Cortes, Javier ;
O'Shaughnessy, Joyce ;
Loesch, David ;
Blum, Joanne L. ;
Vahdat, Linda T. ;
Petrakova, Katarina ;
Chollet, Philippe ;
Manikas, Alexey ;
Dieras, Veronique ;
Delozier, Thierry ;
Vladimirov, Vladimir ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Koh, Han ;
Bougnoux, Philippe ;
Dutcus, Corina E. ;
Seegobin, Seth ;
Mir, Denis ;
Meneses, Nicole ;
Wanders, Jantien ;
Twelves, Chris .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9769) :914-923
[7]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[8]   A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale [J].
Eton, DT ;
Cella, D ;
Yost, KJ ;
Yount, SE ;
Peterman, AH ;
Neuberg, DS ;
Sledge, GW ;
Wood, WC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (09) :898-910
[9]   Assessing the Quality and Value of Quality-of-Life Measurement in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials [J].
Ganz, Patricia A. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (03) :196-199
[10]   Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer - Taking stock [J].
Goodwin, PJ ;
Black, JT ;
Bordeleau, LJ ;
Ganz, PA .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (04) :263-281