Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures

被引:4
作者
Boesmueller, Sandra [1 ]
Michel, Marc [1 ]
Hofbauer, Marcus [1 ]
Platzer, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Trauma, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Risk factors; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Non-union; Pseudarthrosis; Revision arthroplasty; INTERNAL-FIXATION; PROSTHESIS NAIL; PROXIMAL FEMUR; MANAGEMENT; REPLACEMENT; CERCLAGE; B3; B2;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-014-2489-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose In case of stem loosening in periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF), revision arthroplasty should be performed. The first hypothesis of this study was that advanced patient age and female gender shows higher non-union rates. The second hypothesis was that primary cementless arthroplasty is associated with a higher non-union rate compared to cemented primary hip arthroplasty. Methods All PPFF occurring between January 2000 and June 2010 treated by revision arthroplasty were included. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables leading to fracture non-union. Results Eighty one patients (78 % female) met the inclusion criteria. In 20/81 patients (24.7 %) no adequate fracture healing could be determined on radiographs 12 months after revision surgery. Although age and female gender showed a positive correlation with bony non-union after PPFF as expected, the p-values were not statistically significant. Multiple regression analysis revealed primary cementless prosthesis (p = 0.001) to be the only independent variable associated with non-union. Conclusion Non-cemented primary prosthesis might be a negative predicting factor for the development of non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in PPFF. We therefore recommend the thorough debridement of pannus tissue thus inducing bone healing before the implantation of revision prostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 622
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Beals RK, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P238
  • [2] Epidemiology - Hip and knee
    Berry, DJ
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 30 (02) : 183 - +
  • [3] Management of periprosthetic fractures - The hip
    Berry, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04) : 11 - 13
  • [4] Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: Biomechanics and biology
    Bong, Matthew R.
    Kummer, Frederick J.
    Koval, Kenneth J.
    Egol, Kenneth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2007, 15 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [5] Reamed intramedullary nailing versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for shaft fracture of femur: a systematic literature review
    Duan, Xin
    Li, Tao
    Mohammed, Al-Qwbani
    Xiang, Zhou
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (10) : 1445 - 1452
  • [6] Duncan CP, 1995, AAOS INSTR COURS LEC, V44, P293
  • [7] Hip Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Fractures of Vancouver Type B2 and B3
    Fink, Bernd
    Grossmann, Alexandra
    Singer, Joachim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (04) : 206 - 211
  • [8] FITZGERALD RH, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P61
  • [9] Reaming during anterograde femoral nailing: is it worth it?
    Forster, MC
    Aster, AS
    Ahmed, S
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (03): : 445 - 449
  • [10] Periprosthetic femoral fractures - a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties
    Foster, AP
    Thompson, NW
    Wong, J
    Charlwood, AP
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (03): : 424 - 429