Risk of malignancy on suspicion of polyps in menopausal women

被引:20
作者
Bel, Sandra [1 ]
Billard, Camille [1 ]
Godet, Julien [2 ]
Viviani, Victor [1 ]
Akladios, Cherif [3 ]
Host, Aline [1 ]
Faller, Emilie [3 ]
Boisrame, Thomas [3 ]
Hummel, Michel [1 ]
Baldauf, Jean-Jacques [3 ]
Lecointre, Lise [3 ]
Garbin, Olivier [1 ]
机构
[1] Strasbourg Univ, Teaching Hosp, CMCO Hosp, Strasbourg, France
[2] Strasbourg Univ, Teaching Hosp, NHC Hosp, Strasbourg, France
[3] Strasbourg Univ, Teaching Hosp, Hautepierre Hosp, Strasbourg, France
关键词
Endometrial polyps; Menopause; Hysteroscopy; ENDOMETRIAL POLYPS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Improved performances in gynaecological ultrasonography have enabled an increasing number of often asymptomatic endometrial polyps to be detected. Most of these polyps are removed surgically, as a precautionary measure, so as not to miss a case of endometrial cancer. Nonetheless, this management strategy is based solely on the sonographer's judgement and a number of these operations, which are probably of no benefit, could be avoided. In order to do so, risk factors for malignancy need to be identified. Objective: Estimate the prevalence of lesions in menopausal patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of endometrial polyp. Establish risk factors for malignancy. Study design: This is a single-centre retrospective study. Enrolment criteria were menopausal patients aged over 45 who had undergone hysteroscopic resection of a polyp. Pre-op diagnosis was made either by ultrasonography or diagnostic hysteroscopy. Malignant lesions included cancers and atypical hyperplasia. Benign lesions consisted of simple polyps, non-atypical simple hyperplasia and non-atypical complex hyperplasia. Risk factors studied were existing abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial thickness, personal or first-degree family history of gynaecological cancer (breast, cervix, endometrium, ovary) and age on diagnosis. Results: 631 patients were enrolled of whom 30 presented a malignant disorder (4.75%); 579 patients (91.76%) presented a simple polyp, 11 a non-atypical simple hyperplasia (1.74%) and 11 a non-atypical complex hyperplasia (1.74%). On univariate analysis age alone proved to be statistically significant (OR 1.05; 95%Cl = [1.02-1.09] p < 0.01), with a threshold of 59 years of age on the ROC curve.On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a malignant lesion were age (OR = 1.06; 95% CI [1.02-1.10]), existence of AUB (OR = 2.4; 95% CI [1.07-5.42]) and family history (OR = 2.88; 95%CI [1.08-7.67]). Neither the univariate nor multivariate model was able to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship with respect to endometrial thickness. The risk of malignancy was 12.3% in patients aged over 59 presenting AUB. For all other subgroups, the risk varied between 2.31 and 3.78%. Conclusion: The risk of a malignant lesion appears to be high (12%) in menopausal patients aged over 59 presenting an endometrial polyp detected when there is pre-existing AUB. In this situation, hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps should therefore be routinely proposed. For other patients, the risk of a malignant lesion is low but not insignificant, standing at about 3%. Each patient record should therefore be discussed on an individual case basis, taking into consideration the patient's pre-existing conditions, after providing clear and appropriate information. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 142
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Endometrial polyps in pre- and postmenopausal women: Factors associated with malignancy [J].
Antunes, A., Jr. ;
Costa-Paiva, L. ;
Arthuso, M. ;
Costa, J. V. ;
Pinto-Neto, A. M. .
MATURITAS, 2007, 57 (04) :415-421
[2]   The malignant potential of endometrial polyps [J].
Ben-Arie, A ;
Goldchmit, C ;
Laviv, Y ;
Levy, R ;
Caspi, B ;
Huszar, M ;
Dgani, I ;
Hagay, Z .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (02) :206-210
[3]   Roles of Sonography and Hysteroscopy in the Detection of Premalignant and Malignant Polyps in Women Presenting with Postmenopausal Bleeding and Thickened Endometrium [J].
Cavkaytar, Sabri ;
Kokanali, Mahmut Kuntay ;
Ceran, Ufuk ;
Topcu, Hasan Onur ;
Sirvan, Levent ;
Doganay, Melike .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (13) :5355-5358
[4]   Endometrial polyps: when to resect? [J].
da Rocha de Azevedo, Julia Marques ;
da Rocha de Azevedo, Ligia Marques ;
Freitas, Fernando ;
Osorio Wender, Maria Celeste .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (03) :639-643
[5]  
Enzo Ricciardi, 2017, EUR J OBSTETD GYNECO, V183, P121
[6]   Hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial polyps [J].
Fernandez-Parra, J. ;
Rodriguez Oliver, A. ;
Lopez Criado, S. ;
Parrilla Fernandez, F. ;
Montoya Ventoso, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 95 (02) :144-148
[7]   How often are endometrial polyps malignant in asymptomatic postmenopausal women? A multicenter study [J].
Ferrazzi, Enrico ;
Zupi, Errico ;
Leone, Francesco P. ;
Savelli, Luca ;
Omodei, Umberto ;
Moscarini, Massimo ;
Barbieri, Maurizio ;
Cammareri, Giuseppe ;
Capobianco, Giampiero ;
Cicinelli, Ettore ;
Coccia, Maria E. ;
Donarini, Gloria ;
Fiore, Simona ;
Litta, Paolo ;
Sideri, Mario ;
Solima, Eugenio ;
Spazzini, Donata ;
Testa, Antonia C. ;
Vignali, Massimo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (03) :235.e1-235.e6
[8]   Ultrasonographic detection of asymptomatic endometrial cancer in postmenopausal patients offers no prognostic advantage over symptomatic disease discovered by uterine bleeding [J].
Gerber, B ;
Krause, A ;
Müller, H ;
Reimer, T ;
Külz, T ;
Kundt, G ;
Friese, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (01) :64-71
[9]   Evaluation of endometrial polyps [J].
Goldstein, SR ;
Monteagudo, A ;
Popiolek, D ;
Mayberry, P ;
Timor-Tritsch, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (04) :669-674
[10]   The Oncogenic Potential of Endometrial Polyps A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Lee, Stephanie Cruz ;
Kaunitz, Andrew M. ;
Sanchez-Ramos, Luis ;
Rhatigan, Ronald M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (05) :1197-1205