Term induction of labour in nulliparous women: When to draw the line?

被引:1
作者
Mitchell, Jill M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Dicker, Patrick [2 ]
Madigan, Grace [1 ]
Nicholson, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Smyth, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Breathnach, Fionnuala M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rotunda Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Rotunda Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol, 57 Parnell Sq West, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Matern Hosp Limerick, Ennis Rd, Limerick, Ireland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Induction of labour; Cervical ripening; Dinoprostone; Prostaglandin; Perinatal outcomes; BISHOP SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100148
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: There exists uncertainty surrounding the most effective and efficient means of inducing labour, particularly in the setting of an unfavourable cervix. This study aims to determine the merit of repeating dinoprostone administration when a single application has failed to render the cervix favourable for amniotomy.Study design: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of nulliparous women who underwent term induction of labour in a tertiary referral centre in Ireland was conducted over a 12-month period (December 2019 to January 2021). The time-interval from dinoprostone administration to delivery and the incidence of complicated birth, associated with single and sequential dinoprostone dosing, were determined. Comparisons were made using the Chi-square test and logistic regression adjusting for gestational age delivery.Results: 586 nulliparous women underwent term induction of labour during the study period. Administration of a single dose of dinoprostone or amniotomy alone were associated with the greatest prospect of an uncomplicated vaginal birth when compared to sequential dinoprostone dosing. Nonetheless, just one in four nulliparous women undergoing induction of labour experienced an unassisted and uncomplicated vaginal birth. The median [interquartile range] for time interval from induction to delivery or decision for caesarean delivery was 0.4 [0.3-0.6] days in those who underwent amniotomy alone, compared to 1.1 [0.7-1.5] days, 1.8 [1.4-2.2] days and 2.2 [2.0-2.6] days for those with 1, 2 or 3 doses of dinoprostone, respectively (p < 0.001 between all groups; Figure 1)Conclusion: These contemporaneous data indicate that in circumstances where more than a single dose of dinoprostone is required for cervical priming in a nulliparous woman, the incidence of an uncomplicated vaginal delivery decreased from more than half of women to less than one third. Over one third of women who were administered either a single dose of dinoprostone or more than one dose experienced an emergency intrapartum Caesarean delivery or a complicated vaginal birth. These findings are relevant to nulliparous women undergoing induction of labour in the setting of an unfavourable cervix and should be incorporated into shared decision making consultations, particularly when repeat administration of dinoprostone is being considered.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, NICE Clinical Guidelines
  • [2] Prostaglandin vaginal gel induction of labor comparing amniotomy with repeat prostaglandin gel
    Beckmann, Michael
    Kumar, Sailesh
    Flenady, Vicki
    Harker, Ellen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) : 859.e1 - 859.e9
  • [3] Shared decision-making: summary of NICE guidance
    Carmona, Chris
    Crutwell, Joseph
    Burnham, Marie
    Polak, Louisa
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 373
  • [4] Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
    Grobman, William A.
    Rice, Madeline M.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Perez-Delboy, Annette
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Boggess, Kim A.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (06) : 513 - 523
  • [5] Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), 2019, Propess <(R)> 10 mg vaginal delivery system dinoprostone Physician Leaflet
  • [6] Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), 2019, Prostin <(R)> E2 1 mg and 2 mg Vaginal Gels dinoprostone Physician Leaflet
  • [7] Bishop score: A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery
    Hendrix, NW
    Chauhan, SP
    Morrison, JC
    Magann, EF
    Martin, JN
    Devoe, LD
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 91 (03) : 248 - 252
  • [8] HSE, 2013, National Consent Policy. Patient Safety First.
  • [9] Role of early amniotomy with induced labor: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
    Kim, Sun Woo
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Levine, Lisa D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2019, 1 (04)
  • [10] The Bishop Score as a Predictor of Labor Induction Success: A Systematic Review
    Kolkman, Diny G. E.
    Verhoeven, Corine J. M.
    Brinkhorst, Sophie J.
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Pajkrt, Eva
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 30 (08) : 625 - 630