The citation impact of research collaborations:: the case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988-2002)

被引:86
作者
Frenken, K
Hölzl, W
de Vor, F
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Urban & Reg Res Ctr Utrecht, Sect Econ Geog, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Vienna Univ Econ & Business Adm0, Dept Econ, Vienna, Austria
关键词
citation impact; knowledge networks; diffusion; institutional collaboration;
D O I
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.11.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research collaboration is generally motivated by quality enhancement. The networks underlying collaborative knowledge production also serve as vehicles of knowledge diffusion. Both aspects are expected to contribute to the citation impact of publications. We analyse knowledge production in European biotechnology for the period 1988-2002 focusing on the role of research collaboration. Different aspects of research collaboration are taken into account simultaneously to assess their relative importance. We distinguish between the number of contributing authors and addresses as to differentiate between the effect of the collaboration between individuals and between organizations. We further distinguish between different spatial scales of collaboration (national, European, international) and between different institutional types of collaboration (between academia, outside academia, and hybrid). We find evidence that the diffusion of scientific knowledge, as measured by citation rate, is dependent on both intra- and inter-organisational characteristics. An important finding has also been that the further differences in citation impact can be related to the geographical scale of collaboration with the European scale being most successful. Furthermore, country-fixed effects suggest that the European Union, though successful as a geographical scale of collaboration, still harbours, many national varieties of knowledge production. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 30
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Adams J.D., 2004, 10640 NBER
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, WORKSH CLUST HIGH TE
  • [3] Institution, inertia and European Union research policy
    Banchoff, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2002, 40 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [4] Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
    Barabási, AL
    Jeong, H
    Néda, Z
    Ravasz, E
    Schubert, A
    Vicsek, T
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 311 (3-4) : 590 - 614
  • [5] The geography of scientific citation
    Batty, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 2003, 35 (05) : 761 - 765
  • [6] Belsley DA, 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
  • [7] Cameron A.C., 1986, Journal of Applied Econometrics, V1, P29, DOI [10.1002/jae.3950010104, DOI 10.1002/JAE.3950010104]
  • [8] Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions
    Cooke, P
    Uranga, MG
    Etxebarria, G
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (4-5) : 475 - 491
  • [9] Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix
    Rickard Danell
    Olle Persson
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58 (2) : 203 - 218
  • [10] DASGUPTA P, 1994, RES POLICY, V23, P487