Secondary Traumatic Stress in Foster Carers: Risk Factors and Implications for Intervention

被引:36
作者
Bridger, Kay M. [1 ]
Binder, Jens F. [1 ]
Kellezi, Blerina [1 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Nottingham, England
关键词
Foster carers; Looked after children; Secondary trauma; Indirect trauma; Self-care; COMPASSION SATISFACTION; SELF-CARE; BURNOUT; FATIGUE; EMPATHY; EXPOSURE; RESILIENCE; VALIDATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10826-019-01668-2
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objectives Fostering, a professional or semi-professional role that is in increasing demand, involves potential exposure to material related to children's trauma in a domestic setting. Yet, professional vulnerability to secondary traumatic stress (STS) is under-researched in foster carers, as is the suitability of associated intervention techniques. We therefore investigated incidence of STS and psychological predictors relevant to secondary and primary stress appraisal in UK foster carers. Methods British foster carers (n = 187; 81% female; aged 23-72 years; mean length of experience 9 years) were approached through a range of organizations managing paid foster caring in the UK for a survey study. Self-report measures were obtained on STS, burnout and compassion satisfaction from the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, as well as on primary trauma and variables previously recommended for inclusion in training targeting secondary trauma: empathy, resilience and self-care. Results High levels of STS and burnout were found among foster carers. In multivariate model testing, STS was directly and positively predicted by burnout, compassion satisfaction and primary trauma (R-2 = 0.54, p < 0.001). Resilience, empathy and self-care did not show direct associations with STS, but self-care had a significant indirect effect on STS. Conclusions Findings support the view that STS is a substantial risk factor in foster caring. While self-care is confirmed as a promising factor in intervention, the roles of empathy and resilience are more ambiguous.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 492
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
*AC ED, 2018, SEC TRAUM WORKPL STR
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Foster care statistics 2016
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Children looked after in England including adoptions'
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659]
[6]  
Bride B., 2009, TRAUMATOLOGY, V15, P96, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1534765609336362, 10.1177/1534765609336362]
[7]   Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience [J].
Campbell-Sills, Laura ;
Stein, Murray B. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2007, 20 (06) :1019-1028
[9]   Development and Validation of a Brief Self-Report Measure of Trauma Exposure: The Trauma History Screen [J].
Carlson, Eve B. ;
Smith, Steve R. ;
Palmieri, Patrick A. ;
Dalenberg, Constance ;
Ruzek, Josef I. ;
Kimerling, Rachel ;
Burling, Thomas A. ;
Spain, David A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 23 (02) :463-477
[10]  
*CHILDR COMM ENGL, 2018, VULN REP 2018