Implementing specifications grading in MPA courses: A potential strategy for better work-life balance

被引:10
作者
Jones, Peter A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
Specifications grading; public administration; work-life balance; TIME ALLOCATIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; FACULTY MEMBERS; COMPETENCE; PROGRAMS; GENDER; CONTRACT; OUTCOMES; GRADES;
D O I
10.1080/15236803.2020.1773713
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Public administration scholarship has documented the effectiveness of rubrics in assessing student competencies within classrooms and across MPA programs. Rubrics are one of many innovative techniques, however. As we advance pedagogy in public administration, scholars should consider additional grading techniques and evaluate a grading system beyond just its effectiveness. To fill this gap, I overview a new grading approach called specifications grading, which was developed by sociologist Linda Nilson. I explain its structure and offer an example of how I implemented it in a graduate-level public administration course, and then I summarize my experience and how students viewed the specifications grading. Finally, I conclude with challenges faculty may face in implementing the system as well as opportunities for a better work-life balance through a potentially more efficient grading method.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 547
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Managing Institutional Research Advancement: Implications from a University Faculty Time Allocation Study [J].
Anderson, Derrick M. ;
Slade, Catherine P. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 57 (01) :99-121
[2]   Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Grading Through the Use of Computer-Assisted Grading Rubrics [J].
Anglin, Linda ;
Anglin, Kenneth ;
Schumann, Paul L. ;
Kaliski, John A. .
DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2008, 6 (01) :51-73
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 18 ACM C INN TECHN
[4]  
[Anonymous], COLL TEACHING
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, DOI DOI 10.1080/02602930500187055
[6]  
Aufrecht S. E., 1997, Journal of Public Administration Education, V3, P43, DOI [10.1080/10877789.1997.12023407, DOI 10.1080/10877789.1997.12023407]
[7]   Grades and incentives: assessing competing grade point average measures and postgraduate outcomes [J].
Bailey, Michael A. ;
Rosenthal, Jeffrey S. ;
Yoon, Albert H. .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (09) :1548-1562
[8]   Effects of academic discipline and teaching goals in predicting grading beliefs among undergraduate teaching faculty [J].
Barnes, LLB ;
Bull, KS ;
Campbell, NJ ;
Perry, KM .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2001, 42 (04) :455-467
[9]  
Bellas ML, 1999, REV HIGH EDUC, V22, P367
[10]   Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries [J].
Bentley, Peter James ;
Kyvik, Svein .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 54 (03) :329-348