Plasma gasification versus incineration of plastic waste: Energy, economic and environmental analysis

被引:84
作者
Cudjoe, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Hong [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Agr, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Plastic waste; Plasma gasification; Incineration; Electricity; Economy; Environment; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; PYROLYSIS; BIOMASS; GAS; CONVERSION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107470
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The rise in plastic waste production and its mismanagement poses huge environmental issues. Thermochemical techniques can minimize the amount of plastic waste discarded in landfills, reduce carbon footprints, increase conversion efficiency, and be cost-effective. Studies that compare the economic feasibility and environmental impact of treatment of mixed plastic waste for power generation via thermochemical methods are limited. The present study compares the electricity generation potential, economic feasibility, and environmental performance of plasma gasification and incineration of mixed plastic waste in China. The prominent findings show that plasma gasification's total power generation potential is 4378.6 GWh, while incineration is 491.2 GWh. The economic feasibility analysis shows that both projects are feasible with a positive net present value. Plasma gasification is highly beneficial with a higher net present value ($309.1 million), return on investment (32.1%), internal rate of return (27%), lower payback period (5.3 years), and levelized cost of energy ($0.230/kWh). The environmental assessment indicates that compared to the environmental impact, the environmental benefits of both projects are little. Relative to incineration, the environmental performance of plasma gasification is promising. This paper can give scientific guidance for optimal investment and decision-making on the environmental sustainability of mixed plastic waste treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Financial feasibility of waste to energy strategies in the United Arab Emirates [J].
Abdallah, Mohamed ;
Shanableh, Abdallah ;
Shabib, Ahmad ;
Adghim, Mohamad .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 82 :207-219
[2]   Nigeria biogas potential from livestock manure and its estimated climate value [J].
Adeoti, O. ;
Ayelegun, T. A. ;
Osho, S. O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 37 :243-248
[3]   Flexible packaging plastic waste-environmental implications, management solutions, and the way forward [J].
Ahamed, Ashiq ;
Veksha, Andrei ;
Giannis, Apostolos ;
Lisak, Grzegorz .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 32
[4]   Recent advancements of thermochemical conversion of plastic waste to biofuel-A review [J].
Al Rayaan, Mohammed B. .
CLEANER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 2
[5]  
Al-Salem SM, 2019, PDL HANDB SER, P45, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813140-4.00003-0
[6]  
[Anonymous], Labour force participation rates, male (% of male population ages 15+) (modelled ILO estimate)-Cuba
[7]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[8]   The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion [J].
Assamoi, Bernadette ;
Lawryshyn, Yuri .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) :1019-1030
[9]   Effect of collection efficiency and oxidation factor on greenhouse gas emission and life cycle cost of landfill distributed energy generation [J].
Ayodele, T. R. ;
Alao, M. A. ;
Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
[10]   Electricity generation prospective of hydrogen derived from biogas using food waste in south-western Nigeria [J].
Ayodele, T. R. ;
Alao, M. A. ;
Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O. ;
Munda, J. L. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 127