Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles

被引:14
作者
Flodin, J. [1 ,2 ]
Juthberg, R. [1 ,2 ]
Ackermann, P. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Sect Orthoped & Sports Med, Integrat Orthoped Lab, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Trauma, Acute Surg & Orthoped, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Electric stimulation therapy; Pain threshold; Patient comfort; Electrode configuration; Skeletal muscles; INTERMITTENT; RECOVERY; POSITION;
D O I
10.1186/s13102-022-00403-7
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may prevent muscle atrophy, accelerate rehabilitation and enhance blood circulation. Yet, one major drawback is that patient compliance is impeded by the discomfort experienced. It is well-known that the size and placement of electrodes affect the comfort and effect during high-intensity NMES. However, during low-intensity NMES the effects of electrode size/placement are mostly unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how electrode size and pragmatic placement affect comfort and effect of low-intensity NMES in the thigh and gluteal muscles. Methods On 15 healthy participants, NMES-intensity (mA) was increased until visible muscle contraction, applied with three electrode sizes (2 x 2 cm, 5 x 5 cm, 5 x 9 cm), in three different configurations on quadriceps and hamstrings (short-transverse (ST), long-transverse (LT), longitudinal (L)) and two configurations on gluteus maximus (short-longitudinal (SL) and long-longitudinal (LL)). Current-density (mA/cm(2)) required for contraction was calculated for each electrode size. Comfort was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10). Significance was set to p < 0.05 and values were expressed as median (inter-quartile range). Results On quadriceps the LT-placement exhibited significantly better comfort and lower current intensity than the ST- and L-placements. On hamstrings the L-placement resulted in the best comfort together with the lowest intensity. On gluteus maximus the LL-placement demonstrated better comfort and required less intensity than SL-placement. On all muscles, the 5 x 5 cm and 5 x 9 cm electrodes were significantly more comfortable and required less current-density for contraction than the 2 x 2 cm electrode. Conclusion During low-intensity NMES-treatment, an optimized electrode size and practical placement on each individual muscle of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteals is crucial for comfort and intensity needed for muscle contraction.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ALON G, 1994, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V20, P29
[2]   HIGH-VOLTAGE STIMULATION - EFFECTS OF ELECTRODE SIZE ON BASIC EXCITATORY RESPONSES [J].
ALON, G .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1985, 65 (06) :890-895
[3]  
Altman D. G., 1991, Practical statistics for medical research
[4]   Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning [J].
Botter, Alberto ;
Oprandi, Gianmose ;
Lanfranco, Fabio ;
Allasia, Stefano ;
Maffiuletti, Nicola A. ;
Minetto, Marco Alessandro .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 111 (10) :2461-2471
[5]   Comparative lower limb hemodynamics using neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) versus intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) [J].
Broderick, Barry J. ;
O'Connell, Sandra ;
Moloney, Shelly ;
O'Halloran, Kevin ;
Sheehan, James ;
Quondamatteo, Fabio ;
Quinlan, Leo R. ;
OLaighin, Gearoid .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 35 (09) :1849-1859
[6]  
BROOKS M E, 1990, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, V11, P530
[7]  
Forrester BJ., 2004, J APPL RES, V4, P346
[8]  
Frandin K., 1994, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, V4, P41
[9]   Short vs. long pulses for testing knee extensor neuromuscular properties: does it matter? [J].
Giroux, Caroline ;
Roduit, Boris ;
Rodriguez-Falces, Javier ;
Duchateau, Jacques ;
Maffiuletti, Nicola A. ;
Place, Nicolas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 118 (02) :361-369
[10]   Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening? [J].
Glaviano, Neal R. ;
Saliba, Susan .
SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2016, 8 (01) :79-85