Influence of Sex on the Physical-chemical Characteristics of Abdominal Chicken Fat

被引:10
作者
Marx, S. D. [1 ]
Soares, J. M. [1 ]
Prestes, R. C. [2 ]
Schnitzler, E. [3 ]
Oliveira, C. S. [3 ]
Demiate, I. M. [1 ,3 ]
Backes, G. T. [1 ]
Steffens, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Integrated Reg Univ URI, Dept Food Engn, Erechim, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Dept Technol & Food Sci, Grad Program Food Sci & Technol PPGCTA, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[3] State Univ Ponta Grossa UEPG, Grad Program Food Sci & Technol PPGCTA, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
关键词
Fatty acids; raw material; DSC; byproducts; CARCASS QUALITY; ENERGY-LEVELS; MEAT QUALITY; BROILERS; PERFORMANCE; DIETS; OIL;
D O I
10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0072
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine if sex influenced abdominal fat yield, chemical composition, pH, color, fatty acid profile, and stability (by Differential Scanning Calorimetry - DSC) of Cobb chickens. Abdominal fat yields of 1.86 and 1.49% were obtained for females and males, respectively. Abdominal fat lipid contents of 70.68 and 74.36 g/100g, moisture content of 27.87 and 24.09 g/100g, protein content of 0.91 and 0.95 g/100g, ash content of 0.038 and 0.041 g/100g were obtained in males and females, respectively. Fat pH was not different between sexes, with values of 6.71 for males and 6.63 for females (p< 0.05). Color L* values of 58.67 and 55.42, a* values of 4.95 and 3.44, and b* values of 7.36 and 8.18 were obtained for males and females, respectively. Female abdominal fat contained higher proportion of oleic acid (53.87%) followed by palmitic acid (30.07%), whereas 34.69% palmitic acid, 31.92% oleic acid, and 25.30% linoleic acid were determined in males. The proportions of the evaluated fatty acids were significantly different (p>0.05) between males and females, except for palmitic acid. The DSC analysis showed no significant difference (p> 0.05) between sexes for melting and crystallization points. It was concluded that sex influences abdominal chicken fat yield, chemical composition, color, and DSC parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
AOAC, 1995, CRUD PROT MEAT, V2
[2]  
Beraquet NJ, 1990, AVICULTURA SUINOCULT, V8, P34
[3]  
BLIGH EG, 1959, CAN J BIOCHEM PHYS, V37, P911
[4]   Chicken fat: technological and nutritional alternatives [J].
Centenaro, Graciela Salete ;
Mendes Furlan, Valcenir Junior ;
de Souza-Soares, Leonor Almeida .
SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2008, 29 (03) :619-629
[5]  
Chiu MC, 2001, THESIS
[6]  
Chiu Ming Chih, 2007, Rev. Bras. Cienc. Farm., V43, P421, DOI 10.1590/S1516-93322007000300011
[7]  
Chiu Ming Chih, 2002, Food Sci. Technol (Campinas), V22, P151, DOI 10.1590/S0101-20612002000200009
[8]   Multivariate statistical analysis treatment of DSC thermal properties for animal fat adulteration [J].
Dahimi, Omar ;
Rahim, Alina Abdul ;
Abdulkarim, S. M. ;
Hassan, Mohd Sukri ;
Hashari, Shazamawati B. T. Zam ;
Mashitoh, A. Siti ;
Saadi, Sami .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2014, 158 :132-138
[9]  
DIN - Deutsches Institut fur Normung, 2003, 14103 DIN
[10]  
Duarte Karina Ferreira, 2007, Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences, V29, P39