The pain of breathing: how does haze pollution affect urban innovation?

被引:12
作者
Feng, Wei [1 ]
Yuan, Hang [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Jingguan Bldg,Dongnandaxue Rd 2, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
关键词
Haze pollution; Spatial correlation; Urban innovation; AIR-POLLUTION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; PRODUCTIVITY EVIDENCE; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACT; HEALTH; WEATHER; TREND; CHINA;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-18279-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In China, innovation plays an important role in achieving economic development with green growth, but innovation activities are inhibited by the spread of haze pollution (also called smog). Using panel data on 265 cities in China at the prefectural level from 2001 to 2018, this paper investigates the relationship between haze pollution and urban innovation. The conclusions are as follows. First, haze pollution has a significant inhibitory effect on urban innovation. After we consider endogeneity, eliminate extreme values, replace variables, and incorporate spatial correlation, we find that the negative impact of haze pollution on urban innovation still exists. Second, the channels through which haze pollution affects urban innovation are mainly attributed to production efficiency, willingness to consume, and entrepreneurial activity. Third, the inhibitory effect of haze pollution on innovation has a spatial spillover effect. Fourth, among the different regions in China, the most serious inhibitory effect of haze pollution on innovation is in the central region, while that of the eastern and western regions is insignificant. Moreover, across diverse Chinese cities, the significant inhibitory effects of haze pollution on innovation are mainly in cities that are abundant in natural resource. Accordingly, the efficient management of haze pollution is a critical prerequisite and effective guarantee for increasing urban innovation, such as promoting clean energy, strengthening technological innovation, and improving human capital.
引用
收藏
页码:42664 / 42677
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The impact of transboundary haze pollution on household utilities consumption [J].
Agarwal, Sumit ;
Sing, Tien Foo ;
Yang, Yang .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 85
[2]   Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Rahman, Zia Ur ;
Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal ;
Khan, Zia Ullah .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 30 (01) :89-109
[3]  
Arshad MNM, 2015, INT J ECON MANAG ACC, V23, P37
[4]  
Bartik Timothy J, 1991, Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?, DOI DOI 10.17848/9780585223940
[5]   Is there a link between air pollution and mental disorders? [J].
Buoli, Massimiliano ;
Grassi, Silvia ;
Caldiroli, Alice ;
Carnevali, Greta Silvia ;
Mucci, Francesco ;
Iodice, Simona ;
Cantone, Laura ;
Pergoli, Laura ;
Bollati, Valentina .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 118 :154-168
[6]   Particulate Pollution and the Productivity of Pear Packers [J].
Chang, Tom ;
Zivin, Joshua Graff ;
Gross, Tal ;
Neidell, Matthew .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 8 (03) :141-169
[7]   The Effect of Pollution on Worker Productivity: Evidence from Call Center Workers in China [J].
Chang, Tom Y. ;
Zivin, Joshua Graff ;
Gross, Tal ;
Neidell, Matthew .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 11 (01) :151-172
[8]   Indirect Economic Impact Incurred by Haze Pollution: An Econometric and Input-Output Joint Model [J].
Chen, Jibo ;
Chen, Keyao ;
Wang, Guizhi ;
Chen, Rongrong ;
Liu, Xiaodong ;
Wei, Guo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (13)
[9]   The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China [J].
Chen, Zhao ;
Kahn, Matthew E. ;
Liu, Yu ;
Wang, Zhi .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 88 :468-485
[10]   The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions [J].
Dauda, Lamini ;
Long, Xingle ;
Mensah, Claudia Nyarko ;
Salman, Muhammad .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (15) :15028-15038