Comparison of integrin αvβ3 expression and glucose metabolism in primary and metastatic lesions in cancer patients:: A PET study using 18F-galacto-RGD and 18F-FDG

被引:146
作者
Beer, Ambros J. [1 ]
Lorenzen, Sylvie [2 ]
Metz, Stephan [3 ]
Herrmann, Ken [1 ]
Watzlowikl, Petra [1 ]
Wester, Hans-Juergen [1 ]
Pesche, Christian [2 ]
Lordick, Florian [2 ]
Schwaiger, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Nucl Med, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Hematol Oncol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Radiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
关键词
alpha(v)beta(3); F-18-galacto-RGD; F-18-FDG; PET; oncology;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.107.045864
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The expression of alpha(v)beta(3) and glucose metabolism are upregulated in many malignant lesions, and both are known to correlate with an aggressive phenotype. We evaluated whether assessment of alpha(v)beta(3) expression and of glucose metabolism with PET using F-18-galacto-RGD and F-18-FDG provides complementary information in cancer patients. Methods: Eighteen patients with primary or metastatic cancer (non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], n = 10; renal cell carcinoma, n = 2; rectal cancer, n = 2; others, n = 4) were examined with PET using F-18-galacto-RGD and F-18-FDG. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were derived by volume-of-interest analysis. F-18-Galacto-RGD and F-18-FDG PET results were compared using linear regression analysis for all lesions (n = 59; NSCLC, n = 39) and for primaries (n = 14) and metastases to bone (n = 11), liver (n = 10), and other organs (n = 24) separately. Results: The sensitivity of F-18-galacto-RGD PET compared with clinical staging was 76%. SUVs for F-18-FDG ranged from 1.3 to 23.2 (mean +/- SD, 7.6 +/- 4.9) and were significantly higher than SUVs for F-18-galacto-RGD (range, 0.3-6.8; mean +/- SD, 2.7 +/- 1.5; P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the SUVs for 18F-FDG and F-18-galacto-RGD for all lesions (r = 0.157; P = 0.235) or for primaries, osseous or soft-tissue metastases separately (P > 0.05). For the subgroup of lesions in NSCLC, there was a weak correlation between (18)FDG and F-18-galacto-RGD uptake (r = 0.353; P = 0.028). Conclusion: Tracer uptake of F-18-galacto-RGD and F-18-FDG does not correlate closely in malignant lesions. Whereas F-18-FDG PET is more sensitive for tumor staging, F-18-galacto-RGD PET warrants further evaluation for planning and response evaluation of targeted molecular therapies with antiangiogenic or alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET:: Histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis
    Avril, N
    Menzel, M
    Dose, J
    Schelling, M
    Weber, W
    Jänicke, F
    Nathrath, W
    Schwaiger, M
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [22] Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using 18F-FDG PET:: A comparison study with CT
    Yun, MJ
    Lim, JS
    Noh, SH
    Hyung, WJ
    Cheong, JH
    Bong, JK
    Cho, A
    Lee, JD
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (10) : 1582 - 1588
  • [23] Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for thoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer
    Kirchner, Julian
    Sawicki, Lino M.
    Nensa, Felix
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt M.
    Reis, Henning
    Ingenwerth, Marc
    Bogner, Simon
    Aigner, Clemens
    Buchbender, Christian
    Umutlu, Lale
    Antoch, Gerald
    Herrmann, Ken
    Heusch, Philipp
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (02) : 437 - 445
  • [24] Direct comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma
    Cohade, C
    Osman, M
    Leal, J
    Wahl, RL
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (11) : 1797 - 1803
  • [25] Synchronous primary neoplasms detected on 18F-FDG PET in staging of patients with esophageal cancer
    van Westreenen, HL
    Westerterp, M
    Jager, PL
    van Dullemen, HM
    Sloof, GW
    Comans, EFI
    van Lanschot, JJB
    Wiggers, T
    Plukker, JTM
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (08) : 1321 - 1325
  • [26] 18F-FACBC and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the evaluation of 3 patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: a pilot study
    Husby, Trine
    Johannessen, Knut
    Berntsen, Erik Magnus
    Johansen, Hakon
    Giskeodegard, Guro Fannelob
    Karlberg, Anna
    Fagerli, Unn-Merete
    Eikenes, Live
    EJNMMI REPORTS, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [27] Detection of 18F-FDG PET/CT Occult Lesions With 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in a Patient With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Hammers, Hans J.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Allaf, Mohammad E.
    Javadi, Mehrbod Som
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (01) : 83 - 85
  • [28] Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging with different dual time 18F-FDG PET/CT with forced diuresis in clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Yu, Longhua
    Huang, Shiming
    Wu, Siyu
    Yue, Jianlan
    Yin, Liang
    Lin, Zhichun
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (02) : E32331
  • [29] Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET
    Schwarz, JD
    Bader, M
    Jenicke, L
    Hemminger, G
    Jänicke, F
    Avril, N
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (07) : 1144 - 1150
  • [30] 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors:: Comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy
    Chen, Wei
    Silverman, Daniel H. S.
    Delaloye, Sibylle
    Czernin, Johannes
    Kamdar, Nirav
    Pope, Whitney
    Satyamurthy, Nagichettiar
    Schiepers, Christiaan
    Cloughesy, Tirnothy
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2006, 47 (06) : 904 - 911