Effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in Romanian Alpine Biogeographical Region: an assessment based on forest landscape connectivity

被引:17
作者
Niculae, M. I. [1 ]
Avram, S. [2 ,3 ]
Vanau, G. O. [1 ]
Patroescu, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Ctr Environm Res & Impact Studies, 1st Nicolae Balcescu Blvd,Sect 1, Bucharest 010041, Romania
[2] Univ Craiova, Dept Geog, AI Cuza 13, Craiova 200585, Romania
[3] Romanian Acad, Natl Inst Econ Res Costin C Kiritescu, Romanian Acad House,Calea 13 Septembrie,13 Sect 5, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Forest patches; Natura; 2000; connectivity; CONEFOR; Alpine Biogeographical Region; Romania; HABITAT PATCHES; PROTECTED AREAS; MAMMALS; CONSERVATION; EUROPE; CONFIGURATION; AVAILABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; RANGE; FOCUS;
D O I
10.15287/afr.2016.793
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Maintaining and increasing landscape connectivity, especially of forest landscapes, are some of the main concerns regarding biodiversity conservation. The connectivity of protected areas for different species represents an indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network. Our research aims to evaluate the connectivity of forest landscapes in the Romanian Alpine Biogeographical Region (ABR) for various terrestrial species. We analysed the distribution of forest patches and Sites of Community Importance (SCI), as part of Natura 2000 network, in the Romanian ABR. We evaluated the connectivity of forest patches for terrestrial species with different dispersal distances, identifying those patches with significant contribution to maintain the forest landscape connectivity, through the graph theory approach. To quantify the importance of each node, we evaluated the dPCconnector fraction derived from the dPC index. Of the 125 SCIs in the Romanian ABR, 71 protected areas have over 1000 ha, four of them have more than 100,000 ha. The total protected surfaces cover similar to 35% of the Romanian ABR, and the forest surfaces, protected in SCIs, cover 26% of the total Romanian ABR. Regarding the connectivity scores, we found that the forest surfaces across the ABR are well connected (0.89 or 1 for different dispersal distances) in comparison with the Natura 2000 forest patches. The forest patches are well connected especially for the species with large dispersal distance in both cases (d = 25 km). For the species characterized by a small dispersion distance, the connectivity is lower (0.46) in the case of protected forests. Our results evidence that the connectivity objective of the forest surfaces protected through the Nature 2000 network is not totally achieved. Furthermore new protected areas are needed where the forest are still present for increasing landscape connectivity for species.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 32
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]  
EEA, 2016, Biogeographical Regions
[12]  
EUSTAFOR, 2013, NATURA 2000 MAN EUR
[13]   Building the European Union's Natura 2000 network [J].
Evans, Douglas .
NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2012, (01) :11-26
[14]   Two measures of landscape-graph connectivity: assessment across gradients in area and configuration [J].
Ferrari, Joseph R. ;
Lookingbill, Todd R. ;
Neel, Maile C. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (09) :1315-1323
[15]   The European Union's 2010 target:: Putting rare species in focus [J].
Fontaine, Benoit ;
Bouchet, Philippe ;
Van Achterberg, Kees ;
Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel Angel ;
Araujo, Rafael ;
Asche, Manfred ;
Aspoeck, Ulrike ;
Audisio, Paolo ;
Aukema, Berend ;
Bailly, Nicolas ;
Balsamo, Maria ;
Bank, Ruud A. ;
Barnard, Peter ;
Belfiore, Carlo ;
Bogdanowicz, Wieslaw ;
Bongers, Tom ;
Boxshall, Geoffrey ;
Burckhardt, Daniel ;
Camicas, Jean-Louis ;
Chylarecki, Przemek ;
Crucitti, Pierangelo ;
Deharveng, Louis ;
Dubois, Alain ;
Enghoff, Henrik ;
Faubel, Anno ;
Fochetti, Romolo ;
Gargominy, Olivier ;
Gibson, David ;
Gibson, Ray ;
Gomez Lopez, Maria Soledad ;
Goujet, Daniel ;
Harvey, Mark S. ;
Heller, Klaus-Gerhard ;
Van Helsdingen, Peter ;
Hoch, Hannelore ;
De Jong, Herman ;
De Jong, Yde ;
Karsholt, Ole ;
Los, Wouter ;
Lundquist, Lars ;
Magowski, Wojciech ;
Manconi, Renata ;
Martens, Jochen ;
Massard, Jos A. ;
Massard-Geimer, Gaby ;
Mcinnes, Sandra J. ;
Mendes, Luis F. ;
Mey, Eberhard ;
Michelsen, Verner ;
Minelli, Alessandro .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 139 (1-2) :167-185
[16]   Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe) [J].
Gurrutxaga, Mikel ;
Rubio, Lidon ;
Saura, Santiago .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2011, 101 (04) :310-320
[17]   Amphibian distribution in a traditionally managed rural landscape of Eastern Europe: Probing the effect of landscape composition [J].
Hartel, Tibor ;
Schweiger, Oliver ;
Oellerer, Kinga ;
Cogalniceanu, Dan ;
Arntzen, Jan W. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (05) :1118-1124
[18]   Population effects of landscape model manipulation on two behaviourally different woodland small mammals [J].
Henein, K ;
Wegner, J ;
Merriam, G .
OIKOS, 1998, 81 (01) :168-186
[19]  
Hunter M.A., 2010, Wildlife, forests, and forestry: principles of managing forests for biological diversity, VSecond
[20]   The efficacy of Romania's protected areas network in conserving biodiversity [J].
Ioja, Cristian Ioan ;
Patroescu, Maria ;
Rozylowicz, Laurentiu ;
Popescu, Viorel D. ;
Verghelet, Mircea ;
Zotta, Mihai Iancu ;
Felciuc, Mihaela .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (11) :2468-2476