Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy

被引:10
作者
Fujii, Shinsuke [1 ]
Hayashi, Tetsutaro [1 ]
Honda, Yukiko [2 ]
Terada, Hiroaki [2 ]
Akita, Ryuji [3 ]
Kitamura, Naoyuki [4 ]
Ueda, Eikoh [4 ]
Han, Xiangrui [1 ]
Ueno, Takeshi [1 ]
Miyamoto, Shunsuke [1 ]
Kitano, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Inoue, Shogo [1 ]
Teishima, Jun [1 ]
Abdi, Hamidreza [5 ]
Awai, Kazuo [2 ]
Takeshima, Yukio [6 ]
Sentani, Kazuhiro [7 ]
Yasui, Wataru [7 ]
Matsubara, Akio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Urol, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Support, Sect Radiat Therapy, Hiroshima, Japan
[4] Kasumi Clin, Hiroshima, Japan
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Pathol, Hiroshima, Japan
[7] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Mol Pathol, Hiroshima, Japan
关键词
cancer detection rate; clinically significant cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT VALUES; TRANSITION ZONE CANCERS; ULTRASOUND FUSION; GUIDED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; ACCURACY; SYSTEM; TRIAL; MRI;
D O I
10.1111/iju.14149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the clinical benefits of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy for biopsy-naive Japanese men. Methods Between February 2017 and August 2018, 131 biopsy-naive men who underwent targeted biopsy together with 10-core systematic biopsy at Hiroshima University Hospital were retrospectively investigated. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings were reported based on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2. Results The overall cancer detection rates per patient were 69.5% in systematic biopsy + targeted biopsy cores, 61.1% in systematic biopsy cores and 61.1% in targeted biopsy cores. The detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer were 43.5% in targeted biopsy cores and 35.9% in systematic biopsy cores (P = 0.04), whereas the detection rates for clinically insignificant prostate cancer were 17.6% and 25.2% respectively (P = 0.04). Lesions in the peripheral zone were diagnosed more with clinically significant prostate cancer (54.8% vs 20.7%, P < 0.001) and International Society of Urological Pathology grade (3.2 vs 2.7, P = 0.02) than that in the inner gland. Just 4.2% (3/71) of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 2 and 3 lesions in the middle or base of the inner gland were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. The cancer detection rate per core was 42.3% in targeted biopsy cores, whereas it was 17.9% in systematic biopsy cores (P < 0.001). Conclusions Targeted biopsy is able to improve the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by reducing the number of clinically insignificant prostate cancer detections compared with 10-core systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive Japanese men. In addition, the present findings suggest that patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 2 or 3 lesions at the middle or base of the inner gland might avoid biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] 3T multiparametric MR imaging, PIRADSv2-based detection of index prostate cancer lesions in the transition zone and the peripheral zone using whole mount histopathology as reference standard
    Asvadi, Nazanin Hajarol
    Mirak, Sohrab Afshari
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein Mohammadian
    Khoshnoodi, Pooria
    Wibulpolprasert, Pornphan
    Margolis, Daniel
    Sisk, Anthony
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Raman, Steven S.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (11) : 3117 - 3124
  • [3] A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy
    Baco, Eduard
    Rud, Erik
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Moen, Gunnar
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Svindland, Aud
    Eggesbo, Heidi B.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 149 - 156
  • [4] Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Shtern, Faina
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Cornud, Francois
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [5] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [6] Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison of Random and Targeted Biopsies
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    Peyromaure, Michael
    Schull, Alexandre
    Beuvon, Frederic
    Bouazza, Naim
    Flam, Thierry
    Zerbib, Marc
    Muradyan, Naira
    Legman, Paul
    Cornud, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) : 493 - 499
  • [7] GRIGNON DJ, 1994, J CELL BIOCHEM, P267
  • [8] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Kauffman, Christopher R.
    Garcia-Reyes, Kirema
    Palmeri, Mark L.
    Madden, John F.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [9] Comparison of Elastic and Rigid Registration during Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Multi-Operator Phantom Study
    Hale, Graham R.
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Cheng, Alexis
    Bloom, Jonathan B.
    Seifabadi, Reza
    Gold, Samuel A.
    Rayn, Kareem N.
    Sabarwal, Vikram K.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Brad
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (05) : 1114 - 1121
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Men With Repeat Negative Biopsies and Increased Prostate Specific Antigen
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Hoeks, Caroline
    Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
    Huisman, Henkjan
    Yakar, Derya
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) : 520 - 527