PREDICTORS OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY EFFICACY COMBINED WITH PROSTATIC IRRADIATION: THE CENTRAL ROLE OF TUMOR STAGE AND RADIATION DOSE

被引:13
|
作者
Williams, Scott [1 ,2 ]
Buyyounouski, Mark [3 ]
Kestin, Larry [4 ]
Duchesne, Gillian [2 ]
Pickles, Tom [5 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[5] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 79卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radiotherapy; Androgen deprivation; Outcomes; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PHASE-III TRIAL; DEFINING BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; LOCALLY ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HORMONAL-THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the response of clinically localized prostate cancer to various durations of planned androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and to investigate subgroups predicting response. Methods and Materials: Data of 3,666 prostate cancer patients treated with either combined ADT and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or EBRT alone at four institutions were examined. ADT consisted of neoadjuvant, concurrent, or adjuvant ADT or combinations of these regimens. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical failure (nadir plus 2 ng/ml), assessed from the end of therapy. Factors predictive for the need for ADT were examined with interaction analyses. Results: The impact of increasing ADT duration was nonlinear with, on average, 6 months of adjuvant ADT resulting in a reduction of the risk of biochemical failure by 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-46%), while 12, 24, and 36 months of ADT resulted in a 58% (95% Cl, 47%-67%), 66% (95% CI, 55%-75%), and 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%) relative failure reduction, respectively. Patients with higher T stage cancers and those treated with lower radiation doses had a significantly greater benefit for increasing ADT duration (interaction, p = 0.016 and p = 0.007, respectively). Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen values, Gleason score, age, and risk group did not modify the response to ADT. Conclusions: The known ADT efficacy derived from randomized studies can be generalized to patients with different features, and individual predictions of potential benefit from ADT use and duration may be calculated to aid patient and physician decision making. Tumor stage and radiation dose variations were related to significantly different ADT duration effects. The validity of these predictive factors requires prospective evaluation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 731
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypofractionated radiation therapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy for clinically node-positive prostate cancer
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Pyo, Hongryull
    Yoo, Gyu Sang
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Kang, Minyong
    Song, Wan
    Chung, Jae Hoon
    Bae, Bong Kyung
    Park, Won
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 42 (02): : 139 - 147
  • [22] Causes of Mortality After Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Tendulkar, Rahul D.
    Hunter, Grant K.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Stephans, Kevin L.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Abdel-Wahab, May
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Mahadevan, Arul
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01): : 94 - 99
  • [23] Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
    Murakami, Motohiro
    Ishikawa, Hitoshi
    Shimizu, Shosei
    Iwata, Hiromitsu
    Okimoto, Tomoaki
    Takagi, Masaru
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    Wada, Hitoshi
    Arimura, Takeshi
    Sato, Yoshitaka
    Gosho, Masahiko
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Sakurai, Hideyuki
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) : 1 - 10
  • [24] The effect of androgen deprivation and radiation therapy on an androgen sensitive murine tumor: An in vitro and in vivo study
    Zietman, AL
    Nakfoor, BM
    Prince, EA
    Gerweck, LE
    CANCER JOURNAL FROM SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1997, 3 (01): : 31 - 36
  • [25] Comparative Efficacy of Combined Radiotherapy, Systemic Therapy, and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wang, Yuhan
    Gui, Huiming
    Wang, Juan
    Tian, Junqiang
    Wang, Hanzhang
    Liang, Chaozhao
    Hao, Zongyao
    Rodriguez, Ronald
    Wang, Zhiping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [26] Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-Central Lung Tumor
    Rim, Chai Hong
    Yoon, Won Sup
    Park, Sunmin
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (04):
  • [27] Predictive value of PAK6 and PSMB4 expression in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with dose-escalation radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy
    Zapatero, Almudena
    Morente, Manuel
    Nieto, Santiago
    Martin de Vidales, Carmen
    Lopez, Consuelo
    Adrados, Magdalena
    Arellano, Ramon
    Jesus Artiga, Maria
    Garcia-Vicente, Feliciano
    Miguel Herranz, Luis
    Leaman, Olwen
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (08) : 1327 - 1332
  • [28] Dose-escalated Radiation Therapy With and Without Short-course Androgen Deprivation for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Schreiber, David
    Rineer, Justin
    Surapaneni, Aparna
    Navo, Elliot
    Agarwal, Manuj
    Nwokedi, Emmanuel
    Rotman, Marvin
    Schwartz, David
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (08) : 4189 - 4193
  • [29] Re: Combined Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Randomised, Phase 3 Trial
    Saad, Fred
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (05) : 932 - 933
  • [30] The Clinical Cell-Cycle Risk (CCR) Score Is Associated With Metastasis After Radiation Therapy and Provides Guidance on When to Forgo Combined Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Dose-Escalated Radiation
    Tward, Jonathan
    Lenz, Lauren
    Flake, Darl D., II
    Rajamani, Saradha
    Yonover, Paul
    Olsson, Carl
    Kapoor, Deepak A.
    Mantz, Constantine
    Liauw, Stanley L.
    Antic, Tatjana
    Fabrizio, Michael
    Salzstein, Daniel
    Shore, Neal
    Albertson, Dan
    Henderson, Jonathan
    Lee, Steve P.
    Gay, Hiram A.
    Michalski, Jeff
    Hung, Arthur
    Raben, David
    Garraway, Isla
    Lewis, Michael S.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Marshall, David T.
    Brawer, Michael K.
    Stone, Steven
    Cohen, Todd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 113 (01): : 66 - 76