PREDICTORS OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY EFFICACY COMBINED WITH PROSTATIC IRRADIATION: THE CENTRAL ROLE OF TUMOR STAGE AND RADIATION DOSE

被引:13
|
作者
Williams, Scott [1 ,2 ]
Buyyounouski, Mark [3 ]
Kestin, Larry [4 ]
Duchesne, Gillian [2 ]
Pickles, Tom [5 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[5] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 79卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radiotherapy; Androgen deprivation; Outcomes; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PHASE-III TRIAL; DEFINING BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; LOCALLY ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HORMONAL-THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the response of clinically localized prostate cancer to various durations of planned androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and to investigate subgroups predicting response. Methods and Materials: Data of 3,666 prostate cancer patients treated with either combined ADT and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or EBRT alone at four institutions were examined. ADT consisted of neoadjuvant, concurrent, or adjuvant ADT or combinations of these regimens. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical failure (nadir plus 2 ng/ml), assessed from the end of therapy. Factors predictive for the need for ADT were examined with interaction analyses. Results: The impact of increasing ADT duration was nonlinear with, on average, 6 months of adjuvant ADT resulting in a reduction of the risk of biochemical failure by 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-46%), while 12, 24, and 36 months of ADT resulted in a 58% (95% Cl, 47%-67%), 66% (95% CI, 55%-75%), and 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%) relative failure reduction, respectively. Patients with higher T stage cancers and those treated with lower radiation doses had a significantly greater benefit for increasing ADT duration (interaction, p = 0.016 and p = 0.007, respectively). Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen values, Gleason score, age, and risk group did not modify the response to ADT. Conclusions: The known ADT efficacy derived from randomized studies can be generalized to patients with different features, and individual predictions of potential benefit from ADT use and duration may be calculated to aid patient and physician decision making. Tumor stage and radiation dose variations were related to significantly different ADT duration effects. The validity of these predictive factors requires prospective evaluation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 731
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Predictors of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Efficacy Combined with Prostatic Irradiation: The Central Role of Tumor Stage and Radiation Dose
    Mason, Malcolm
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (01) : 179 - 180
  • [2] Combined radiation therapy and androgen deprivation in the management of prostate cancer: Where do we stand?
    Bellefqih, S.
    Hadadi, K.
    Mezouri, I.
    Maghous, A.
    Marnouche, E.
    Andaloussi, K.
    Elmarjany, M.
    Sifat, H.
    Mansouri, H.
    Benjaafar, N.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2016, 20 (02): : 141 - 150
  • [3] Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Zeng, Siping
    Guan, Gangyun
    Qin, Qiuwei
    Xie, Huadong
    Meng, Yongyan
    Zhao, Qiyue
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [4] The role of androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical failure and distant metastasis in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: effects of radiation dose escalation
    Ludwig, Michelle S.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Du, Xianglin L.
    Lopez, David S.
    Yamal, Jose-Miguel
    Strom, Sara S.
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [5] Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial
    Warde, Padraig
    Mason, Malcolm
    Ding, Keyue
    Kirkbride, Peter
    Brundage, Michael
    Cowan, Richard
    Gospodarowicz, Mary
    Sanders, Karen
    Kostashuk, Edmund
    Swanson, Greg
    Barber, Jim
    Hiltz, Andrea
    Parmar, Mahesh K. B.
    Sathya, Jinka
    Anderson, John
    Hayter, Charles
    Hetherington, John
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    Parulekar, Wendy
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9809) : 2104 - 2111
  • [6] Effect of combined transient androgen deprivation and irradiation following radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer
    Eulau, SM
    Tate, DJ
    Stamey, TA
    Bagshaw, MA
    Hancock, SL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04): : 735 - 740
  • [7] The role of androgen deprivation therapy plus radiation therapy in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer
    Zhao, Sherry
    Urdaneta, Alfredo I.
    Anscher, Mitchell S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (09) : 929 - 942
  • [8] Androgen-deprivation therapy alone versus combined with radiation therapy or chemotherapy for nonlocalized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lei, Jun-Hao
    Liu, Liang-Ren
    Wei, Qiang
    Song, Tu-Run
    Yang, Lu
    Meng, Yang
    Han, Ping
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2016, 18 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [9] Role of combined ADT and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy in primary pN0-stage
    Bottke, Dirk
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Hoecht, Stefan
    Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie
    Ott, Saskia
    Ganswindt, Ute
    Bolenz, Christian
    Wiegel, Thomas
    ONKOLOGE, 2019, 25 (04): : 330 - 337
  • [10] Role of radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Rossi, Peter J.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2015, 39 (01) : 41 - 47