Improving Algorithm Response to Preference Changes in Multiobjective Optimisation Using Archives

被引:0
作者
Taylor, Kendall [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ]
Chan, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
2019 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC) | 2019年
关键词
Interactive optimisation; Preference modeling; Multiobjective optimisation; Evolutionary computation; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1109/cec.2019.8789949
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Using evolutionary algorithms to solve optimisation problems with multiple objectives has proven very successful over the past few decades. The ability of these methods to efficiently find sets of solutions representing trade-offs between conflicting objectives has enhanced decision making in a wide variety of fields. Increasingly though, such techniques are being adapted to incorporate end-user preferences in order to reduce search spaces and provide smaller sets of targeted solutions. Eliciting these preferences interactively during optimisation has also become popular and helps a decision maker explore and learn and the problem and its range of solutions. Interactivity also facilitates the correction of mistakes and inaccurate preferences, leading to more satisfactory solutions, faster. In order to achieve these benefits an algorithm must be able to rapidly respond to changes in preferences. This work explores the use of secondary population archives to ensure a preference-based algorithm can change its search focus efficiently and effectively. When preferences change and the search is redirected to a new region of interest, an archive of previously found solutions can be consulted and solutions close to the new region can be included in the current population. This work shows how such archives can be implemented and how they can improve responsiveness for certain problems.
引用
收藏
页码:2442 / 2449
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Preference Incorporation in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
    Bechikh, Slim
    Kessentini, Marouane
    Ben Said, Lamjed
    Ghedira, Khaled
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTERS, VOL 98, 2015, 98 : 141 - 207
  • [2] Cheng R., 2016, IEEE T EVOLUTIONARY
  • [3] Collective Preferences in Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization: Techniques and Potential Contributions of Collective Intelligence
    Cinalli, Daniel
    Marti, Luis
    Sanchez-Pi, Nayat
    Bicharra Garcia, Ana Cristina
    [J]. 30TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, VOLS I AND II, 2015, : 133 - 138
  • [4] Coello C. A., 2007, Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems, V2nd ed, pXXI
  • [5] Corne David W., 1999, P C EV COMP CEC 99, P98, DOI [DOI 10.1109/CEC.1999.781913, 10.1109/CEC.1999.781913]
  • [6] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197
  • [7] Deb K., 2001, Multi-objective Optimization Using [Deb, 2001] Evolutionary Algorithms
  • [8] Deb K, 2006, GECCO 2006: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOL 1 AND 2, P635
  • [9] Deb K, 2007, GECCO 2007: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOL 1 AND 2, P781
  • [10] Dynamic multiobjective optimization problems: Test cases, approximations, and applications
    Farina, M
    Deb, K
    Amato, P
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2004, 8 (05) : 425 - 442