Computational Verification of the Optimum Boundary Condition of the Brazilian Tensile Test

被引:6
作者
Gutierrez-Moizant, R. [1 ]
Ramirez-Berasategui, M. [1 ]
Santos-Cuadros, S. [1 ]
Garcia-Fernandez, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Mech Engn, Ave Univ 30, Madrid 28911, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Min Exploitat & Prospecting, Oviedo 33004, Asturias, Spain
关键词
Brazilian test; Crack initiation point; Equivalent stress; Comparison index; DISC TEST; DIAMETRAL COMPRESSION; ELEMENT METHOD; STRESS-FIELD; STRENGTH; FAILURE; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-018-1553-7
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The present research analyses the configuration of jaws to avoid the premature failure of the disc in the Brazilian test. The objective is to depict the loading device configuration that most likely produces results comparable to the Hondros' analytical stress solution. To this end, several numerical analyses have been carried out for different contact angles with the finite element method. It was deduced that the final contact angle plays an important part in the success of the Brazilian test and that the Griffith criterion can be fulfilled if the equivalent stress is calculated. Additionally, the orientation of the forces in the contact between the loading device and the disc has been studied for different friction conditions. According to the numerical results, it was found that a loading arc configuration of 20 degrees shows the best agreement with the probable values given by the analytical stress model when the uncertainty of its magnitudes is taken into account. The study also demonstrates that the friction in the contact between the optimal loading configuration and the disc does not seem to significantly affect the theoretical predictions in the centre of the disc.
引用
收藏
页码:3505 / 3519
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials E384, P1, DOI DOI 10.1520/C0496_C0496M-11
  • [2] [Anonymous], J MAT SCI JAPAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, JCGM 101: evaluation of measurement data - supplement 1 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" - propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, ISO 13528
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, ASTM D3967-16, DOI [DOI 10.1520/D3967-16, 10.1520/D3967-16]
  • [6] BIENIAWSKI ZT, 1978, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V15, P99
  • [7] BIPM I., 2008, Evaluation of measurement data-guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement
  • [8] Carneiro F., 1943, P 5 M BRAZILIAN ASS, P126
  • [9] Brazilian test: stress field and tensile strength of anisotropic rocks using an analytical solution
    Claesson, J
    Bohloli, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2002, 39 (08) : 991 - 1004
  • [10] EA Laboratory Committee, 2013, EA 4 02 M EV UNC MEA