Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older.: Short- and long-term results

被引:9
作者
Mortasawi, A [1 ]
Gehle, S [1 ]
Schröder, T [1 ]
Ennker, IC [1 ]
Rosendahl, U [1 ]
Dalladaku, F [1 ]
Bauer, S [1 ]
Albert, A [1 ]
Ennker, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Herzzentrum Lahr Baden, Klin Herz Thorax & Gefasschirurg, D-77933 Lahr, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE | 2000年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词
aortic valve replacement; mortality; morbidity; survival; 9th decade of life;
D O I
10.1007/s003910070017
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Due to demographic changes in average Life expectancy, the age of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasing as well. We have reviewed the short- and long-term outcome in patients over 80 years of age after aortic valve replacement. From 01 Jan 1995 until 31 Dec 1998, 105 patients (76 women, 29 men between 80 and 89 years, median: 83) underwent aortic valve replacement. 42% presented with aortic stenosis, 58% with combined valve disease with leading stenosis. 53% (group A) received isolated valve replacement, 47% (group B) underwent myocardial revascularization as well. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9% for group A and 14.3% for group B, The follow-up time ranged between 10 and 243 weeks (median: 112 weeks). None of the patients had to be reoperated for prosthetic valve dysfunction or endocarditis. Bleeding complications due to anticoagulant therapy were not observed. Of the 11 deaths during the follow-up period, 5 (45%) were cardiac in nature and 2 (18%) related to stroke. Actuarial survival rates for group A were 98, 95 and 88% at 1, 2 and 3 years, and for group B 92, 84 and 84%, respectively. Permanent nursing care was not required 1 year after the operation by 98% of patients in group A (2 years: 95%, 3 years: 88%) and by 100% of patients in group B (2 years: 95%, 3 years: 88%). At an interval of 1 year after the operation 98% of patients in group A had not been hospitalized as a result of cardiac disorders (2 years: 98%, 3 years: 94%). The rates for group B were 90, 82 and 82%. Compared with younger age groups, aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older is associated with a distinctly increased mortality and morbidity. However, our data suggest that considering the poor prognosis of conservative therapy of symptomatic aortic valve disease, the functional status as well as life expectancy in this age group seems to be positively influenced by aortic valve replacement.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 446
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ACAR J, 1989, EUR HEART J SUPPL, V9, P163
[2]  
AKINS CW, 1997, 33 ANN M SOC THOR SU
[3]  
ARANKI SF, 1993, CIRCULATION, V88, P17
[4]  
Asimakopoulos G, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P3403
[5]   AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS OVER 80 YEARS-OF-AGE - A COMPARATIVE STANDARD FOR BALLOON VALVULOPLASTY [J].
AZARIADES, M ;
FESSLER, CL ;
AHMAD, A ;
STARR, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1991, 5 (07) :373-377
[6]   WHAT IS THE BEST BIOPROSTHETIC OPERATION FOR THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT - ALLOGRAFT, AUTOGRAFT, PORCINE, PERICARDIAL - STENTED OR UNSTENTED [J].
BARRATTBOYES, BG ;
CHRISTIE, GW .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 1994, 9 (02) :158-164
[7]  
BERMAN AD, 1996, CARDIAC CATHETERIZAT, P659
[8]   Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease - Executive summary - A report of the American College of Cardiology American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease) [J].
Bonow, RO ;
Carabello, B ;
de Leon, AC ;
Edmunds, LH ;
Fedderly, BJ ;
Freed, MD ;
Gaasch, WH ;
McKay, CR ;
Nishimura, RA ;
O'Gara, PT ;
O'Rourke, RA ;
Rahimtoola, SH ;
Ritchie, JL ;
Cheitlin, MD ;
Eagle, KA ;
Gardner, TJ ;
Garson, A ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Russell, RO ;
Ryan, TJ ;
Smith, SC .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (18) :1949-1984
[9]  
Burr L H, 1992, J Heart Valve Dis, V1, P87
[10]   PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES IN THE ELDERLY - CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE BY AGE-GROUPS AND VALVE POSITIONS [J].
BURR, LH ;
JAMIESON, WRE ;
MUNRO, AI ;
MIYAGISHIMA, RT ;
GERMANN, E .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 60 (02) :S264-S269