Evaluation of bioresource value models: Sustainable development in the agriculture biorefinery sector

被引:5
作者
Patel, Nidhiben [1 ]
Feofilovs, Maksims [1 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Fac Elect & Environm Engn, 12-1 Azenes iela, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Agriculture biorefinery; Bioeconomy modeling tools; Bioresources; Multi -criteria analysis; Sustainable development; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS; 2ND-GENERATION; BIOECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100367
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The bioeconomy policies and sustainable development goals are a more focused area in the past few years due to their increasing significance in every sector. This research contributes to developing a better bioeconomy strategy concerning its Sustainability within the agricultural biorefinery sector by reviewing the bioeconomy modeling tools. A review shows the multidisciplinary features of the modeling tools; therefore, to analyze these modeling tools under one frame, specific criteria have been selected and evaluated by using the semi-quantitative analysis. A key idea of this study is to evaluate the five different types of bioeconomy modeling tools to estimate the bioresource added value. The Multi-Criteria Analysis approach has been used to compare the bioeconomy modeling tools considering the multidisciplinary feature of the modeling tools within the frame of sustainability development. The study finds that the LCA is the most suitable model to evaluate the bioresource added values. The methodology provides an accurate analysis, and the bioresource value can be estimated by using this novel approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Sustainability prioritization framework of biorefinery: A novel multi-criteria decision-making model under uncertainty based on an improved interval goal programming method
    Lin, Ruojue
    Man, Yi
    Lee, Carman K. M.
    Ji, Ping
    Ren, Jingzheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 251
  • [32] Biotechnology and the bioeconomy Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development
    Lokko, Yvonne
    Heijde, Marc
    Schebesta, Karl
    Scholtes, Philippe
    Van Montagu, Marc
    Giacca, Mauro
    [J]. NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 40 : 5 - 10
  • [33] DevOps and software quality: A systematic mapping
    Mishra, Alok
    Otaiwi, Ziadoon
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2020, 38 (38)
  • [34] Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels
    Mohr, Alison
    Raman, Sujatha
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 114 - 122
  • [35] Patel N., 2021, Agronomy Research, V19, P1099, DOI 10.15159/AR.21.066
  • [36] Food waste biomass: a resource for high-value chemicals
    Pfaltzgraff, Lucie A.
    De Bruyn, Mario
    Cooper, Emma C.
    Budarin, Vitaly
    Clark, James H.
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2013, 15 (02) : 307 - 314
  • [37] Life Cycle Assessment for Economists
    Rajagopal, Deepak
    Vanderghem, Caroline
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 9, 2017, 9 : 361 - 381
  • [38] SCALING METHOD FOR PRIORITIES IN HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES
    SAATY, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 15 (03) : 234 - 281
  • [39] Modelling transport modal shift in TIMES models through elasticities of substitution
    Salvucci, Raffaele
    Tattini, Jacopo
    Gargiulo, Maurizio
    Lehtila, Antti
    Karlsson, Kenneth
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 232 : 740 - 751
  • [40] Sillanpaa M., 2017, BIOECONOMY MULTIDIME, P317, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6_9]