Evaluation of bioresource value models: Sustainable development in the agriculture biorefinery sector

被引:5
作者
Patel, Nidhiben [1 ]
Feofilovs, Maksims [1 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Fac Elect & Environm Engn, 12-1 Azenes iela, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Agriculture biorefinery; Bioeconomy modeling tools; Bioresources; Multi -criteria analysis; Sustainable development; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS; 2ND-GENERATION; BIOECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100367
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The bioeconomy policies and sustainable development goals are a more focused area in the past few years due to their increasing significance in every sector. This research contributes to developing a better bioeconomy strategy concerning its Sustainability within the agricultural biorefinery sector by reviewing the bioeconomy modeling tools. A review shows the multidisciplinary features of the modeling tools; therefore, to analyze these modeling tools under one frame, specific criteria have been selected and evaluated by using the semi-quantitative analysis. A key idea of this study is to evaluate the five different types of bioeconomy modeling tools to estimate the bioresource added value. The Multi-Criteria Analysis approach has been used to compare the bioeconomy modeling tools considering the multidisciplinary feature of the modeling tools within the frame of sustainability development. The study finds that the LCA is the most suitable model to evaluate the bioresource added values. The methodology provides an accurate analysis, and the bioresource value can be estimated by using this novel approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Evaluation and comparison of models and modelling tools simulating nitrogen processes in treatment wetlands
    Edelfeldt, Stina
    Fritzson, Peter
    [J]. SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2008, 16 (01) : 26 - 49
  • [12] Integrated Management of Land Use Systems under Systemic Risks and Security Targets: A Stochastic Global Biosphere Management Model
    Ermolieva, Tatiana
    Havlik, Petr
    Ermoliev, Yuri
    Mosnier, Aline
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Leclere, David
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Valin, Hugo
    Reuter, Wolf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 67 (03) : 584 - 601
  • [13] Mixed integer linear programming in process scheduling: Modeling, algorithms, and applications
    Floudas, CA
    Lin, XX
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 139 (01) : 131 - 162
  • [14] Calculating sustainability in supply chain capitalism
    Freidberg, Susanne
    [J]. ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 42 (04) : 571 - 596
  • [15] Improving Policy Evidence Base for Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security: A Content Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Research
    Gava, Oriana
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Venturi, Francesca
    Brunori, Gianluca
    Pardossi, Alberto
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [16] Gawel E, 2018, WORLD SUSTAIN SER, P517, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_26
  • [17] A Path Transition Towards a BioeconomyThe Crucial Role of Sustainability
    Gawel, Erik
    Pannicke, Nadine
    Hagemann, Nina
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [18] Ethical aspects of life cycle assessments of diets
    Goldstein, Benjamin
    Hansen, Steffen Foss
    Gjerris, Mickey
    Laurent, Alexis
    Birkved, Morten
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2016, 59 : 139 - 151
  • [19] Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators
    Hak, Tomas
    Janouskova, Svatava
    Moldan, Bedrich
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 : 565 - 573
  • [20] Moving towards the second generation of lignocellulosic biorefineries in the EU: Drivers, challenges, and opportunities
    Hassan, Shady S.
    Williams, Gwilym A.
    Jaiswal, Amit K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 101 : 590 - 599