Evaluation of bioresource value models: Sustainable development in the agriculture biorefinery sector

被引:5
作者
Patel, Nidhiben [1 ]
Feofilovs, Maksims [1 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Fac Elect & Environm Engn, 12-1 Azenes iela, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Agriculture biorefinery; Bioeconomy modeling tools; Bioresources; Multi -criteria analysis; Sustainable development; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS; 2ND-GENERATION; BIOECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100367
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The bioeconomy policies and sustainable development goals are a more focused area in the past few years due to their increasing significance in every sector. This research contributes to developing a better bioeconomy strategy concerning its Sustainability within the agricultural biorefinery sector by reviewing the bioeconomy modeling tools. A review shows the multidisciplinary features of the modeling tools; therefore, to analyze these modeling tools under one frame, specific criteria have been selected and evaluated by using the semi-quantitative analysis. A key idea of this study is to evaluate the five different types of bioeconomy modeling tools to estimate the bioresource added value. The Multi-Criteria Analysis approach has been used to compare the bioeconomy modeling tools considering the multidisciplinary feature of the modeling tools within the frame of sustainability development. The study finds that the LCA is the most suitable model to evaluate the bioresource added values. The methodology provides an accurate analysis, and the bioresource value can be estimated by using this novel approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Akkawuttiwanich P., 2017, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, V6, P172
  • [2] Regional policy mobilities: Shaping and reshaping bioeconomy policies in Varmland and Vasterbotten, Sweden
    Andersson, Ida
    Grundel, Ida
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2021, 121 : 142 - 151
  • [3] Angenendt E., 2018, BIOECONOMY SHAPING T, P289, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8, 10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8]
  • [4] EU ambition to build the world's leading bioeconomy-Uncertain times demand innovative and sustainable solutions
    Bell, John
    Paula, Lino
    Dodd, Thomas
    Nemeth, Szilvia
    Nanou, Christina
    Mega, Voula
    Campos, Paula
    [J]. NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 40 : 25 - 30
  • [5] Bosilj-Vuksic V., 2007, INTERDISCIPLINARY J, V2, P73, DOI DOI 10.28945/101
  • [6] The distribution of food security impacts of biofuels, a Ghana case study
    Brinkman, Marnix
    Levin-Koopman, Jason
    Wicke, Birka
    Shutes, Lindsay
    Kuiper, Marijke
    Faaij, Andre
    van der Hilst, Floor
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2020, 141 (141)
  • [7] Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Rincon, Lidia
    Vilarino, Virginia
    Perez, Gabriel
    Castell, Albert
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 394 - 416
  • [8] A mixed-integer optimization model for the economic and environmental analysis of biomass production
    Cobuloglu, Halil Ibrahim
    Bueyuektahtakin, I. Esra
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 67 : 8 - 23
  • [9] An analysis of the factors determining software product quality: A comparative study
    Curcio, Karina
    Malucelli, Andreia
    Reinehr, Sheila
    Paludo, Marco Antonio
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2016, 48 : 10 - 18
  • [10] A review of LCA assessments of forest-based bioeconomy products and processes under an ecosystem services perspective
    D'Amato, D.
    Gaio, M.
    Semenzin, E.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 706