A single-center study on predicting outcomes of primary androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer using the Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (J-CAPRA) score

被引:8
作者
Yamaguchi, Yuichiro [1 ]
Hayashi, Yujiro [1 ]
Ishizuya, Yu [1 ]
Takeda, Ken [1 ]
Nakai, Yasutomo [1 ]
Arai, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Nakayama, Masashi [1 ]
Kakimoto, Ken-ichi [1 ]
Nishimura, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Urol, Higashinari Ku, Osaka 5378511, Japan
关键词
Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (J-CAPRA) score; primary androgen deprivation therapy; prostate cancer; MEN;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyu186
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment scores are reportedly useful for predicting progression-free survival after primary androgen deprivation therapy of prostate cancer patients. This study validated the risk assessment at a single institution. Methods: We studied 255 prostate cancer patients given primary androgen deprivation therapy. Progression-free survival, cause-specific survival and overall survival were analyzed according to Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score-based risk classification. Cases with lymph node or distant metastases were subdivided by the risk classification. Results: Ages ranged from 50 to 90 years (median: 76.5). Observation periods were 2-199 (median: 46.5) months. Primary androgen deprivation therapy includes combined androgen blockade in 150 cases (58.8%), uncombined luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist in 97 (38.0%) and uncombined anti-androgenic agent in 8 (3.2%). Risk classified by Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment scores was low in 104 cases (40.8%), intermediate in 86 (33.7%) and high in 65 (25.5%). The 5-year/10-year progression-free survival rates were 100%/80.8% in the low-risk, 82.3%/69.5% in the intermediate-risk and 34.7%/16.5% in the high-risk group. The 5-year/10-year cause-specific survival rates were 100%/100% in the low-risk, 90.7%/58.2% in the intermediate-risk and 63%/30.8% in the high-risk group. The 5-year/10-year overall survival rates were 87.5%/78.5% in the low-risk, 76.2%/43.1% in the intermediate-risk and 54.9%/25.4% in the high-risk group. For lymph node metastasis, cause-specific survival differed minimally between the intermediate-and high-risk groups (P = 0.1118). For distant metastasis, cause-specific survival differed significantly between the intermediate-and high-risk groups (P = 0.0264). Conclusions: Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score-based risk classification is useful for predicting post-primary androgen deprivation therapy progression-free survival, cause-specific survival and overall survival. Subtyping patients based on Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment scores is particularly useful for predicting cause-specific survival with distant metastasis from prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Potential Benefits of Intermittent Androgen Suppression Therapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Abrahamsson, Per-Anders
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [2] Future Prospects for Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Analogues in Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 85 (02) : 110 - 120
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, Br J Urol, V79, P235
  • [4] Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in men with prostate carcinoma who receive androgen-deprivation therapy
    Basaria, S
    Muller, DC
    Carducci, MA
    Egan, J
    Dobs, AS
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 106 (03) : 581 - 588
  • [5] Risk Assessment Among Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Hinotsu, Shiro
    Namiki, Mikio
    Ito, Kazuto
    Broering, Jeanette
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (26) : 4306 - 4313
  • [6] Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer
    Eisenberger, MA
    Blumenstein, BA
    Crawford, ED
    Miller, G
    McLeod, DG
    Loehrer, PJ
    Wilding, G
    Sears, K
    Culkin, DJ
    Thompson, IM
    Bueschen, AJ
    Lowe, BA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (15) : 1036 - 1042
  • [7] Fujimoto H, 2005, INT J UROL, V12, P46
  • [8] Comparison of the clinical outcome after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer between Japanese and Caucasian men
    Fukagai, T
    Namiki, TS
    Carlile, RG
    Yoshida, H
    Namiki, M
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (06) : 1190 - 1193
  • [9] Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-4