Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign

被引:32
作者
Nelson, William A. [1 ]
Gardent, Paul B. [1 ,2 ]
Shulman, Eliza [3 ,4 ]
Splaine, Mark E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Med Sch, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Ctr Leadership & Improvement, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[2] Tuck Sch Business Dartmouth, Hanover, NH USA
[3] Harvard Vanguard Associates, Dept Family Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2010年 / 19卷 / 06期
关键词
PATIENT SAFETY; CLINICAL MICROSYSTEMS; CONSULTATION; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2009.038943
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Ethics and quality care are common drivers for healthcare organisations. Both are based on ethics principles that are the foundation for quality, and are synergistic with the Institute of Medicine's six quality aims. This paper describes the relationship between ethics principles and the goals of improving quality, safety and value. It demonstrates how healthcare staff, quality improvement professionals and ethics committee members could apply a quality improvement framework to address and prevent ethics issues. Discussion Recurring ethics issues can have a detrimental impact on both the quality of patient care and the culture of a healthcare organisation. Clinical staff and ethics committee members traditionally respond to ethics issues using a reactive approach. Despite nascent interest in a system-oriented preventive approach to ethics issues, there is limited practical advice for ethics committee members regarding how to specifically implement a system redesign strategy. Using an illustrative case study, the authors demonstrate how to apply a recognised quality improvement framework, which focuses on clinical microsystems, to manage and decrease ethics issues-therefore enhancing the organisation's quality of care. Conclusion An important step in enhancing quality and ethics aims would be for the organisation's staff, including quality improvement professionals and ethics committee members, to collaborate in fostering system redesign. The authors' aim is not to examine in detail a specific quality improvement approach or method; rather, they wish to highlight the synergy they believe exists between quality improvement efforts and organisational ethics issues.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The quality and ethics connection: Toward virtuous organizations [J].
Ahmed, PK ;
Machold, S .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2004, 15 (04) :527-545
[2]  
Anderson C A, 1996, J Nurs Care Qual, V11, P22
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PREV ETH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REP AM SOC BIOETH HU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CLIN MICROSYSTEMS AP
[7]  
Aulisio MarkP., 2003, ETHICS CONSULTATION
[8]   The economics of clinical ethics programs: A quantitative justification [J].
Bacchetta, MD ;
Fins, JJ .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 1997, 6 (04) :451-460
[9]  
Beauchamp TL, 2001, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P293
[10]  
Bischoff S J, 1999, J Health Hum Serv Adm, V21, P512