Skeletal anchorage for everybody? A questionnaire study on frequency of use and clinical indications in daily practice

被引:8
作者
Bock, Niko C. [1 ]
Ruf, Sabine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Dept Orthodont, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE | 2015年 / 76卷 / 02期
关键词
Skeletal anchorage; Miniscrews; Temporary anchorage devices; Osseointegrated palatal implants; Questionnaire; NONRESPONSE BIAS; SUCCESS RATES; MINISCREW; IMPLANT; ORTHODONTICS; DEVICES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00056-014-0275-z
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this survey was to determine how commonly, and in what clinical situations, German-based orthodontists use skeletal anchorage devices in daily clinical practice. In early 2013, a set of questionnaires on the subject of skeletal anchorage devices was mailed to 2459 members of the German Orthodontic Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, DGKFO). The questions dealt separately with miniscrews (MSCs) and osseointegrated palatal implants (OPIs). The addressees were asked whether or not, as well as how frequently and in what clinical situations, they used these MSCs and/or OPIs, what their experience was, and to elaborate on their reasons for using or not using these devices. The rate of returned questionnaires was 48 %. To correctly interpret our data, it should be kept in mind that an unknown number of respondents did not distinguish between OPIs and palatally inserted MSCs. Overall, 62 % indicated that they did use MSCs and/or OPIs, although most of them (> 50 %) infrequently (a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 2 new patients/3 months). Only a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 2 % were frequent users (> 2 new patients/week). While most users (> 70 %) indicated that their experience was mostly good, only a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 50 % considered the devices easy and trouble-free to use in daily clinical practice. The median percentage of insertion procedures conducted by the respondents themselves was 2 % for MSCs and 0 % for OPIs. Many of the non-users indicated that their treatment concept did not include suitable clinical indications (a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 50 %), expressed skepticism about the success rates (56 % of MSC and 21 % of OPI non-users), or thought that the insertion procedures involved were too complex or time-consuming (33 % of MSC and 56 % of OPI non-users). A total of 62 % of German-based orthodontists participating in this survey indicated using skeletal anchorage devices, although most of them infrequently. Major reasons for non-use were lack of clinical indications, skepticism about the success rate of MSCs, and overly complex or time-consuming procedures of surgical OPI insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 128
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INF ORTHOD KIEFEROR
[2]   Clinical observations and success rates of palatal implants [J].
Asscherickx, Karlien ;
Vannet, Bart Vande ;
Bottenberg, Peter ;
Wehrbein, Heiner ;
Sabzevar, Mehran Moradi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (01) :114-122
[3]   The HIPAA authorization form and effects on survey response rates, nonresponse bias, and data quality - A randomized community study [J].
Beebe, Timothy J. ;
Talley, Nicholas J. ;
Camilleri, Michael ;
Jenkins, Sarah M. ;
Anderson, Kari J. ;
Locke, G. Richard, III .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (10) :959-965
[4]  
Buschang Peter H, 2008, J Clin Orthod, V42, P513
[5]  
Chen FS, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P593
[6]   A low response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias in gastroenterology survey research: A population-based study [J].
Choung R.S. ;
Locke III G.R. ;
Schleck C.D. ;
Ziegenfuss J.Y. ;
Beebe T.J. ;
Zinsmeister A.R. ;
Talley N.J. .
Journal of Public Health, 2013, 21 (1) :87-95
[7]   Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials [J].
Crismani, Adriano G. ;
Bertl, Michael H. ;
Celar, Ales G. ;
Bantleon, Hans-Peter ;
Burstone, Charles J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (01) :108-113
[8]   Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n > 50) [J].
Dalessandri, Domenico ;
Salgarello, Stefano ;
Dalessandri, Michela ;
Lazzaroni, Elena ;
Piancino, Mariagrazia ;
Paganelli, Corrado ;
Maiorana, Carlo ;
Santoro, Franco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (03) :303-313
[9]   The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias - A meta-analysis [J].
Groves, Robert M. ;
Peytcheva, Emilia .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (02) :167-189
[10]   Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys [J].
Groves, Robert M. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2006, 70 (05) :646-675